[blindLaw] Domino's v Robles (cert re website/app ADA accessibility); pro-ADA amici due Aug 14

[Sai]

Domino's reply brief:

<https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-1539/113926/20190828122403646_DominosCertReply.pdf>

Apparently nobody filed a pro-ADA amicus brief, whereas there were 5
in favor of Domino's desire to not make their app accessible. I'm
disappointed.

However, this is still just at cert stage. If cert is granted,
hopefully the community will get its act together a bit better for the
merits.

Sincerely,
Sai
President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc.

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:38 PM Sai <sai at fiatfiendum.org> wrote:
>
> Here's Robles' opposition brief:
>
> <http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-1539/112343/20190814145428627_20190814-144307-95747527-00000025.pdf>
>
> No pro-ADA amici filed yet. I'm not 100% sure whether amici for cert
> respondent are due the same time as the respondent, Rule 34(2)(a) /
> 37(2)(a), or 7 days after that, Rule 37(3)(a). Not exactly the
> clearest set of federal rules.
>
> Sincerely,
> Sai
> President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc.
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:08 AM Sai <sai at fiatfiendum.org> wrote:
> >
> > https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dominos-pizza-llc-v-robles/
> >
> > QP: Whether websites & apps have to be blind-accessible. CA9 below said yes.
> >
> > A bunch of amici have filed even on the cert petition.
> >
> > Seems likely to have widespread impacts, including on issues y'all litigate. Would suggest you get in on amici pro respondent if you can.
> >
> > Deadline August 14 — and August 4 to get parties' consent. Sup. Ct. R. 34(2)(a)
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Sai
> >
> > Sent from my mobile phone; please excuse the concision and autocorrect errors.