[Blindmath] hydraulic full screen braille display

Roopakshi Pathania r_akshi_tgk at yahoo.com
Sat Jul 17 00:52:44 UTC 2010 

Pretty-much agree their with Steve’s point about translating the steps of a solution that exist in your mind that you may have created using whatever alternative method into a solution that is understandable by the professor.

Continuing with LE’s point, as I have stressed in the passed, knowledge of how the regular symbols appear is important for several reasons; better translation of the problem solving step being one of them.

I also think that to some extent reading and making notes based on the LaTeX source helps in submitting more precise steps for the answer as reading LaTeX is essentially reading how Math is written, and not how Math is supposed to be read.

So I like to imagine the symbols while I am solving a question, and at the same time, base my steps on the steps that I may have encountered in an example from the book for which I had a LaTeX source

Hope I have succeeded as always in confusing all of you.
:-)

Regards

--- On Mon, 7/12/10, Steve Jacobson <steve.jacobson at visi.com> wrote:

> From: Steve Jacobson <steve.jacobson at visi.com>
> Subject: Re: [Blindmath] hydraulic full screen braille display
> To: "Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics" <blindmath at nfbnet.org>, "qubit" <lauraeaves at yahoo.com>
> Date: Monday, July 12, 2010, 5:13 AM
> Laura,
> 
> I don't know which part of your note was addressed to me
> and what was addressed to others.  My comment that one
> 
> may not always take an approach to learning that parallels
> what might be done by a sighted person was not meant to 
> minimize the need to be able to communicate in a way the
> professor can understand easily.  Obviously, when I was
> 
> taking math, most of my text results were dictated to a
> reader, and I learned how to describe my serialized steps in
> a way 
> the reader, and therefore the professor could
> understand.  However, as you already know, there is a
> good deal of 
> problem solving that does not get handed in, exercises in a
> book, where you use the exercise to confirm what you know 
> and reveal where you might need further study.  
> 
> It is good that we have options now, but it does make it
> harder to decide upon an approach.  While it may not be
> 
> necessary to pick only one approach, I think it could be
> easy to get lost bouncing back and forth between approaches
> 
> never getting very proficient at any of them.  To my
> knowledge, we are not going to see a full-page braille
> display any 
> time soon, and multiline displays, while possible, will be
> expensive.  I believe there are approaches that have
> not yet 
> been tried that could make such a thing more possible, but
> often approaches that have real promises also have 
> drawbacks that are not anticipated.  The debate as to
> the usefulness of a full page braille display is pretty
> abstract at 
> this point.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:28:59 -0500, qubit wrote:
> 
> >I agree to the extent that there is sometimes not a
> choice, but with 
> >technology evolving the way it is, it is becoming
> posssible to get books 
> >translated into speech, daisy and braille at a very
> fast rateIt therefore 
> >may become common to get textbooks on time...
> >.  As for not expecting to do things the way the
> sighted person does it, 
> >like it or not, your teacher is probably sighted and
> may find it difficult 
> >to serialize the material the way you need it.
> >You can learn LaTeX and exchange material that way, but
> much math is taught 
> >visually.  It helps to have a tactile
> representation of what is going on. 
> >And equations with limits and integrals and large
> fractions and matrices and 
> >other grouping symbols that enclose vertical columns of
> numbers are easier 
> >when they are written out spatially.  If you have
> a picture in your mind 
> >what it looks like it is easier to read the braille,
> but this is why I like 
> >the DotsPlus approach -- it won't work on a display,
> but it does emboss 
> >equations out spatially with tactile graphics for the
> more spatial symbols.
> >That way you feel the equations the way the class is
> learning them and can 
> >bypass the awkwardness of building up a picture in your
> mind.
> >A plug for DotsPlus. Perhaps some would disagree.
> >Embossers are almost as expensive as braille displays.
> >Happy calculating.
> >--le
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Steve Jacobson" <steve.jacobson at visi.com>
> >To: "Blind Math list for those interested in
> mathematics" 
> ><blindmath at nfbnet.org>
> >Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 9:36 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Blindmath] hydraulic full screen braille
> display
> 
> 
> >Peter,
> 
> >I don't think anyone is saying that more lines are not
> better, only that one 
> >line of braille can work.  When I majored in
> >math, I did everything on a braille writer which of
> course had multiple 
> >lines being limited only by the size of the paper.
> >However, I found that, at least for me, it was not
> usually worth trying to 
> >line things up vertically as I moved from one
> >equasion to another.  I found that it worked to
> process things linearly, 
> >rewriting the equasion as I simplified and solved.
> >This could probably be done with a one line display if
> one developed 
> >techniques to move quickly between a previous
> >and current version of an equasion.  The same
> approach won't work for 
> >everybody and you will have to do some
> >experimenting and learning as you go.  However,
> don't feel that your 
> >solution is to do things just as a sighted person
> >would do them.  sometimes you have to find
> alternatives.  If you are a fair 
> >to good braille reader, I think you will want to
> >get as much of your material in braille as you
> can.  To have any hope of 
> >doing this, you will need to find  out as far in
> >advance which classes you will be taking and what the
> book list is.  I found 
> >that some books were available in braille
> >but were older editions of the same books.  In
> many cases, the changes from 
> >one edition to another are very small and
> >having an older edition is far better than not having
> any copy at all.
> 
> >Good luck.
> 
> >Best regards,
> 
> >Steve Jacobson
> 
> >On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:52:51 -0500, Peter Wolfe wrote:
> 
> >>Ryan and or others:
> 
> 
> 
> >>    Good some contribution to what I had
> to say for once about
> >>something with substance. Can you backup your
> claim? Give us an
> >>example of your matrices. I'm not sure what a
> matrices would be or
> >>anything at all for that matter. I guess you are
> refering to a matrix
> >>by chance? Also, my understanding of calculus with
> Derivatives and
> >>integrals have functions and these are for
> acceleration and velocity
> >>with surely other process in a four quadrant x, y
> and etc. I'd like to
> >>see what you can do in a one to four line display
> in braile and
> >>especially just a one line display that will be
> comprehendable to you
> >>in the long run. I remember when I took precalculus
> I had problems
> >>that on print would take up nearly a page or page
> and a half with a
> >>calculuator with sighted assistance with the visual
> aspects of the
> >>beast. Surely you could enlighten us all on your
> method?
> >>     I think the best way of
> doing mathematics of the advanced level
> >>is to see it all in one point going down as you go
> latterially. I
> >>cannt see that horizontally at all other than
> standard mathematics at
> >>all. I'm confused to what you mean and who could
> properly teach such
> >>methods to anyone in a understandable way. I'll
> find out when I
> >>actually take the classes right? This is conforting
> to someone who
> >>likes to be prepared for everything on the ground
> running. I mean I'm
> >>just confused to what aspects are visual and what
> aren't and from what
> >>I've heard from mainly sighted people that it's got
> lots of   room for
> >>interpretation of graphs wit connecting two or so
> things to make up a
> >>unique answer to this issue. How could that be done
> in another format
> >>translated and you create a solution with your
> answer? Thanks for
> >>further information you can shead on this crutial
> issue.
> 
> >>sincerely,
> >>Peter
> 
> >>On 7/10/10, Ryan Thomas <rlt56 at nau.edu>
> wrote:
> >>> Peter,
> >>>
> >>>    I've read a lot of comments
> lately about the difficulty of doing
> >>> higher mathematics with a one or even four
> line braille display.  It's
> >>> entirely possible.  I understand that
> matricies are spacial, but even
> >>> they can be visualized in a row and column
> format using a one line
> >>> display.  Outside of matricies most math
> that I can thing of isn't
> >>> complicated by a one line read out. 
> Derivatives and integrals can
> >>> both be done.  In calc III there is a lot
> of visualization of three
> >>> dimentional figures, but even sighted students
> have to contend with
> >>> that issue and it's kind of the nature of the
> math itself.  I don't
> >>> think it's an accurate claim that the more
> complex math cannot be done
> >>> with the one line display.  I think
> you'll find the same as you
> >>> actually take the classes.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>>    Ryan
> >>>
> >>> On 7/9/10, Peter Wolfe <sunspot005 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> Le,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>     I've read about
> this project some cause my Program for Students
> >>>> with Disabilities assistant sent me an
> e-mail from North Carolina
> >>>> State University. Well, I think if you
> used simplication using
> >>>> standard Logic 101 you can tell that it's
> a dot conjuction meaning
> >>>> both must be true necessarily. Well, I
> think it should be a
> >>>> disjunction conjunction with an or cause
> it's only the braille with
> >>>> especially the four line proposal on the
> table now. Nothing was stated
> >>>> about images in the article and that is
> unfortunately ashame. However,
> >>>> it's something to expand our mind around
> for the time being. Images
> >>>> are  very abstract and hard to join
> together. The proposed 4 line
> >>>> display is going to be useful in simple
> mathematics and some algebra
> >>>> from simple deduction and not so much on
> high end mathematics at this
> >>>> stage of development.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/8/10, qubit <lauraeaves at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> The following link was the topic of
> discussion on the sci-tech list a
> >>>>> while
> >>>>> back. If you want to know more, such
> as if/when it will be productized,
> >>>>> ask
> >>>>> Sina Bahram.
> >>>>> I wonder if this could do both braille
> and graphics.  The technology is
> >>>>> coming, if people demand it.
> >>>>> --le
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hydraulics Could Enable Fullscreen
> Braille Display | Gadget Lab |
> >>>>> Wired.com
> >>>>> http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/03/braille-display/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Blindmath mailing list
> >>>>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> >>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list
> options or get your account info for
> >>>>> Blindmath:
> >>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/sunspot005%40gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Peter Q. Wolfe, AS
> >>>> sunspot005 at gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Blindmath mailing list
> >>>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> >>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options
> or get your account info for
> >>>> Blindmath:
> >>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/rlt56%40nau.edu
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>> Blindmath mailing list
> >>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or
> get your account info for
> >>> Blindmath:
> >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/sunspot005%40gmail.com
> >>>
> 
> 
> >>-- 
> >>Peter Q. Wolfe, AS
> >>sunspot005 at gmail.com
> 
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Blindmath mailing list
> >>Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> >>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> >>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get
> your account info for 
> >>Blindmath:
> >>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/steve.jacobson%40visi.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >_______________________________________________
> >Blindmath mailing list
> >Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> >http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> >To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your
> account info for 
> >Blindmath:
> >http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/lauraeaves%40yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> >_______________________________________________
> >Blindmath mailing list
> >Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> >http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> >To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your
> account info for Blindmath:
> >http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/steve.jacobson%40visi.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blindmath mailing list
> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your
> account info for Blindmath:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/r_akshi_tgk%40yahoo.com
>

More information about the BlindMath mailing list