[Blindtlk] Inaccessible conference website
National Association of Guide Dog Users
blind411 at verizon.net
Sun Jan 12 03:49:26 UTC 2014
Arielle,
I would say this is directly related to the human services
profession, as research is an integral part of our profession. I will
forward your message to Merry
Schoch, the division president, and our legal counsel for their information.
With warm regards,
Marion Gwizdala
-----Original Message-----
From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Arielle
Silverman
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 12:31 PM
To: Blind Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Inaccessible conference website
Hi Marion,
The conference sponsor is the Society for Personality and Social Psychology,
a private membership organization of research psychologists. It doesn't
directly relate to human services as most members are academic researchers,
though a few may have clinical practices too. I believe the conference uses
a specialized online platform for online registration, which other
conferences may use as well, but I don't recall the name of the platform.
Best,
Arielle
On 1/11/14, National Association of Guide Dog Users <blind411 at verizon.net>
wrote:
> Arielle,
> I have a couple questions concerning this. What sort of conference
is
> this? Is the sponsor a public (governmental) or private entity? As the
> Co-Chair of the Policy & Law Committee of the Human Services Division
> of the National Federation of the Blind, I am gathering information
> concerning the inaccessibility of services that tend to discriminate
> against blind professionals in the human service fields. We have
> already made progress on this issue with the practice tests and
> licensing examinations of the American Board of Clinical Social
> Workers. You may have noticed a message from Valerie Yingling
> concerning Electronic Health Records (HER); This is also an initiative
> of the division. We will be having a Policy & Law Committee meeting
> tomorrow and would like more information concerning this, if it is
> applicable. You can either reply to this list or write to me
> personally at
>
> Marion.Gwizdala at verizon.net
>
> Fraternally yours,
> Marion Gwizdala
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of
> Arielle Silverman
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 3:12 PM
> To: Blind Academics Discussion List
> Cc: blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> Subject: [Blindtlk] Inaccessible conference website
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'm attending an academic conference next month and as I was about to
> submit my online registration, discovered an inaccessible slider that
> had to be slid to the right before the website would let me submit my
> payment info. I complained to the registrar that as a blind person I
> couldn't access the online conference registration, and was told to
> try a different Web browser.
> When I explained that the problem wasn't with the browser's interface
> but with the use of a slider, which to my knowledge cannot interact
> with JAWS, the registrar offered me to fill out a PDF registration
> form and said that they cannot remove the slider because it offers
> enhanced security. She did seem attentive to my concerns but I am not
> terribly confident that the problem will be remedied on the website. I
> eventually decided to have my husband help me with the slider because
> the PDF registration form could not be filled out by computer and so I
> would have needed sighted help regardless, and doing the slider required
less sighted help.
>
> I have a few questions for you guys. First, have any of you had
> success handling these sliders with JAWS? I've never seen such an
> element before on a Web page. Second, do you know if conference
> websites are legally required to be accessible under Section 508? If
> so, I would like to push the matter further. The website for this
> conference had multiple accessibility issues although the slider one
> was the most blatant. I complained to them back in
> 2009 and they fixed some of the problems but not all of them. Third,
> is it really true that a slider offers maximum security and if so,
> what accessible remedy should I suggest to them that doesn't
> compromise security?
>
> Thanks,
> Arielle
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindtlk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/blind411%40veriz
> on.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindtlk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/arielle71%40gmai
> l.com
>
_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/blind411%40verizon.net
More information about the BlindTlk
mailing list