[Ct-nfb] RESOLUTION 2011-17 Regarding the Workforce Investment Act Reauthorization
Richard McGaffin
rmcgaffin at snet.net
Tue Jul 12 11:19:55 UTC 2011
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Monica Webster <monicawebster at me.com> wrote:
Dear Fellow Federationists,
Michael Barber reports that the NFB of Iowa has sent over seventy
letters to Senator Harkin, urging him to remove Section 511 from Title V
of the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA). This bill will be marked up and voted on
Wednesday, June 29, at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time. If your senator is on the
Senate Committee
on Health, Education, Labor, and Pension (HELP committee), please
continue to write and call regarding this issue.
Section 511 reauthorizes payment of subminimum wages to people with
disabilities. It is completely contrary to the purpose of the
Rehabilitation Act, which is intended to promote competitive, integrated
employment.
The following list contains the names of members of the HELP committee.
If your senator is a member of the committee, please call his/her office
to respectfully
express your adamant objection to linking subminimum wage to the
Rehabilitation Act, and to insist that Section 511 of the Rehabilitation
Act be removed
from the bill. If your senator is not a member of the HELP committee,
call the committee chair (Senator Tom Harkin) and the ranking member
(Senator Michael
Enzi) to register your objection. Additional background information on
Section 511 follows after the HELP committee list.
Sincerely,
Anil Lewis
Director of Strategic Communications
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
Telephone: (410) 659-9314, extension 2374
E-mail:
alewis at nfb.org
table with 3 columns and 23 rows
Senator
State
Telephone
Senator Lamar Alexander
Tennessee
(202) 224-4944
Senator Michael F. Bennet
Colorado
(202) 224-5852
Senator Jeff Bingaman
New Mexico
(202) 224-5521
Senator Richard Blumenthal
Connecticut
(202) 224-2823
Senator Richard Burr
North Carolina
(202) 224-3154
Senator Robert Casey, Jr.
Pennsylvania
(202) 224-6324
Senator Mike Enzi
Wyoming
(202) 224-3424
Senator Al Franken
Minnesota
(202) 224-5641
Senator Kay R. Hagan
North Carolina
(202) 224-6342
Senator Tom Harkin
Iowa
(202) 224-3254
Senator Orrin G. Hatch
Utah
(202) 224-5251
Senator Johnny Isakson
Georgia
(202) 224-3643
Senator Mark Steven Kirk
Illinois
(202) 224-2854
Senator John McCain
Arizona
(202) 224-2235
Senator Jeff Merkley
Oregon
(202) 224-3753
Senator Barbara A. Mikulski
Maryland
(202) 224-4654
Senator Lisa Murkowski
Alaska
(202) 224-6665
Senator Patty Murray
Washington
(202) 224-2621
Senator Rand Paul
Kentucky
(202) 224-4343
Senator Pat Roberts
Kansas
(202) 224-4774
Senator Bernard Sanders
Vermont
(202) 224-5141
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse
Rhode Island
(202) 224-2921
table end
Background:
The key legislation around the recent Subminimum Wage legislative alert
is the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), specifically Title V, the
Rehabilitation
Act, which is one of the most important pieces of legislation affecting
the lives of people with disabilities. There is no bill number assigned
at this
time, but we have been provided the proposed draft language. On
Wednesday, June 29, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor,
and Pensions (HELP
committee) will be marking up the WIA reauthorization. So far, we have
been unsuccessful in our efforts to have Section 511 removed from the
language.
As the Senate works to reauthorize the Rehabilitation Act, a new section
has been added, Section 511, which links Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor
Standards
Act (FSLA) to the Rehabilitation Act. Section 14(c) of the FLSA is the
law that allows employers to pay subminimum wages to their workers with
disabilities.
There are more than 5,000 entities that hold special wage certificates
allowing them to pay subminimum wages to more than 400,000 workers with
disabilities.
Section 14(c) is flawed in its implementation, and it has been plagued
with abuse of employers paying workers with disabilities even less than
the subminimum
wage they are entitled to receive as a result of this law. The Wage and
Hour Division (WHD) of the Department of Labor is charged with the
responsibility
of oversight, but they are only able to investigate 2 percent of the
facilities a year. Many workers with disabilities have not been able to
collect millions
of dollars of back wages because the statute of limitations has passed
before WHD can identify the violation.
Section 14(c) is simply unenforceable. We have fought against this
provision since the founding of our organization, and we have made
significant progress.
Section 511 threatens that progress.
The language found in Section 511 is a restatement of Section 14(c) of
the FLSA, linking legislation that is supposed to provide the training
and support
for people with disabilities to obtain competitive employment to
legislation that asserts that people with disabilities cannot be
competitively employed.
The philosophies are in direct conflict, and Section 511 sends a mixed
message about the purpose of vocational rehabilitation (VR).
Section 511 explains the process a counselor would have to go through
before referring a client to a subminimum wage work environment. The
intent is to
make it more difficult for clients to be steered toward subminimum wage
employment. Unfortunately, the language opens a door to subminimum wage
employment
that did not previously exist. As a result of Section 511, if VR fails
to provide a client with the proper training and support to become
competitively
employed, they will be encouraged to make a referral to a subminimum
wage employer.
The language states that, once placed in a subminimum wage work
environment, the client should receive a review every six months.
However, similar to WHD's
inability to enforce Section 14(c) of the FLSA, it will not be possible
for VR to properly enforce this law, leaving even more individuals stuck
in subminimum
wage jobs. A better use of the inadequate funding potentially slated for
enforcement of Section 511, and the insufficient funding for WHD to
enforce Section
14(c) would be to develop creative rehabilitation strategies to
competitively employ all people with disabilities.
Many people have come to believe that subminimum wage employment is an
opportunity for people with disabilities to experience the tangible and
intangible
benefits of work. We maintain that there is no benefit, tangible or
intangible, to working in an environment that asserts that you are not
as good as
everyone else. Industries have been built on this false perception,
allowing people, who otherwise would be able to obtain competitive
employment, to
be exploited at subminimum wages to bolster an employer's profitability.
The job market has changed drastically since the initial passage of this
outdated
legislation. With the proper training and support, people with even the
most significant disabilities are able to be competitively employed.
We need to let members of the Senate Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pension know that Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act
should be removed
from the reauthorization of the Workforce Investment Act.
From: Monica Webster <monicawebster at me.com>
Subject: Re: [Ct-nfb] RESOLUTION 2011-17 Regarding the Workforce Investment Act Reauthorization
To: "NFB of Connecticut Mailing List" <ct-nfb at nfbnet.org>
Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2011, 6:46 AM
What is richard blumenthals number? Anyone have it, that makes life even easier if so
Monica Webster
Coldwell Banker Previews Int'l
On Jul 12, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Richard McGaffin <rmcgaffin at snet.net> wrote:
Hey Justin:
You may have finished selling your M&Ms before me, but with my wife's help we ended up selling another 24 bags so I won in the end (just messing with you) great seeing you at the convention and I have to admit I almost forgot to call, but thankfully Joyce Kane reminded me of it.
have a good one
Rich
--- On Mon, 7/11/11, Salisbury, Justin Mark <SALISBURYJ08 at students.ecu.edu> wrote:
From: Salisbury, Justin Mark <SALISBURYJ08 at students.ecu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Ct-nfb] RESOLUTION 2011-17 Regarding the Workforce Investment Act Reauthorization
To: "NFB of Connecticut Mailing List" <ct-nfb at nfbnet.org>
Date: Monday, July 11, 2011, 2:55 PM
We need everyone to call about this! That means you!
It takes literally less than five minutes. I doubt I could have made that assistant to Senator Blumenthal stay on the phone for five whole minutes even if I had tried. I promise that you all do have the time.
Justin
Justin M. Salisbury
Undergraduate Student
The University Honors Program
East Carolina University
salisburyj08 at students.ecu.edu
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” —MARGARET MEAD
________________________________________
From: ct-nfb-bounces at nfbnet.org [ct-nfb-bounces at nfbnet.org] on behalf of llee at nfbct.org [llee at nfbct.org]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:31 PM
To: NFB of CT list serve
Subject: [Ct-nfb] RESOLUTION 2011-17 Regarding the Workforce Investment Act Reauthorization
Here is a resolution that was passed at the NFB National Convention last week.
RESOLUTION 2011-17
Regarding the Workforce Investment Act Reauthorization
Proponent:
WHEREAS, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions has distributed language for the reauthorization of the
Workforce Investment Act including a proposed Section 511 of Title V
(the Rehabilitation Act), which would provide for employment of
people with significant disabilities at wages below the federally
mandated minimum wage; and
WHEREAS, the proposed language of Section 511 would be a tacit
endorsement of the subminimum wage provision found in Section 14(c)
of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and its antiquated contention
that people with disabilities cannot be competitively employed; and
WHEREAS, this language links the Rehabilitation Act, which was
established to assist people with disabilities in obtaining
competitive integrated employment, with Section 14(c) of the FLSA,
which is based on the false premise that people with disabilities can
not be competitively employed and therefore can be paid subminimum wages;
and
WHEREAS, the language in Section 511 that defines what steps a
vocational rehabilitation counselor must take before steering a
client into subminimum-wage employment is intended to prevent youth
with disabilities from being tracked into subminimum-wage jobs, but
is likely instead to track clients into subminimum-wage employment; and
WHEREAS, language in Section 511 asserts that employers holding a
certificate that allows them to pay subminimum wages can also serve
as training facilities for people with disabilities, a claim that
ignores the fact that job training services provided by an employer
holding a special wage certificate are likely to reinforce the low
expectation that workers with disabilities cannot be competitively
employed, since the incentive is for the employer to continue
exploiting their labor rather than prepare workers for other employment; and
WHEREAS, the Section 511 documentation and review process, which is
meant to provide safeguards against inappropriate use of
subminimum-wage employment, does not take into consideration the fact
that state Vocational Rehabilitation programs do not have the
resources to ensure effective compliance with the various
documentation and review requirements, including the six-month review
period in the proposed language, creating an opportunity to expand
the exploitation caused by Section 14(c) of the FLSA; and
WHEREAS, the good intentions motivating the development of Section
511 are likely to result in enormous negative consequences,
especially the validation of subminimum-wage employment as a viable
outcome for people with disabilities; and
WHEREAS, the language does not provide an effective procedure for
workers to challenge improper placement in such employment: Now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the National Federation of the Blind in Convention
assembled this seventh day of July, 2011, in the city of Orlando,
Florida, that this organization call on members of the Senate
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to remove Section
511 of the proposed Rehabilitation Act; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we call upon all members of Congress,
not to address the unjust law of Section 14(c) with ineffective
measures, but to take direct action to abolish the reprehensible
practice of subminimum-wage employment forever.
_______________________________________________
Nfbnet-members-list mailing list
Nfbnet-members-list at nfbnet.org<mailto:Nfbnet-members-list at nfbnet.org>
_______________________________________________
Ct-nfb mailing list
Ct-nfb at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Ct-nfb:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org/rmcgaffin%40snet.net
_______________________________________________
Ct-nfb mailing list
Ct-nfb at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Ct-nfb:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org/monicawebster%40me.com
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Ct-nfb mailing list
Ct-nfb at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Ct-nfb:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org/rmcgaffin%40snet.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org/attachments/20110712/14151a4b/attachment.html>
More information about the CT-NFB
mailing list