[Ct-nfb] Connecticut Transportation Survey

Mon Feb 1 12:22:42 UTC 2016

Hello all,
I took the survey as well, not that it matters for me being unemployed and somewhat insane. I explained that I really don't care what they do, because I walk everywhere I go, but I also commented that raising the gas tax is bullshit, no I didn't use those words ,nor did I tell them I was insane, but you guys know this so it's no secret be cool folks
be safe if you can
Rich  

    On Sunday, January 31, 2016 12:29 PM, Nathanael T. Wales via Ct-nfb <ct-nfb at nfbnet.org> wrote:

 #yiv8146523314 #yiv8146523314 -- _filtered #yiv8146523314 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv8146523314 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} _filtered #yiv8146523314 {panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;}#yiv8146523314 #yiv8146523314 p.yiv8146523314MsoNormal, #yiv8146523314 li.yiv8146523314MsoNormal, #yiv8146523314 div.yiv8146523314MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;}#yiv8146523314 a:link, #yiv8146523314 span.yiv8146523314MsoHyperlink {color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8146523314 a:visited, #yiv8146523314 span.yiv8146523314MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8146523314 span.yiv8146523314EmailStyle17 {color:windowtext;}#yiv8146523314 span.yiv8146523314EmailStyle18 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8146523314 .yiv8146523314MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv8146523314 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv8146523314 div.yiv8146523314WordSection1 {}#yiv8146523314 Justin,  Thank you for this.  I took the survey, voicing my opinion as a resident, taxpayer, and consumer of both public transportation (especially rail) as well as roads by way of an occasional driver, taxis, and Uber (my personal opinion of which should be self-evident).  I’ve always found NFB chapter and affiliate advocacy on the matter of public transportation interesting and, I might say, a bit of a fine line—so I want to approach recommending that our colleagues take this survey with care.  First, though, I realize that you may very well have just meant that our colleagues should take this survey as a way of participating in the civic process in much the same way we as Federationists put tremendous effort into making voting accessible and encouraging ourselves to vote, be it as a Democrat, Republican, independent, Libertarian, Green (when I served as a chapter president in California for several years my dear colleague and first vice president was a passionate member of this last party…).  The fine line that the NFB walks on advocating on public transportation can indeed be tricky.  Of course we must demand it be accessible, that is, that fare vending machines provide nonvisual access such as through audio output, that bus drivers announce their route (at least at stops where more than one route may stop), that transit websites be usable by screen readers, etc.  But to advocate for a light raile here, a bus route there, better maintenance of rail bridges (my wife and I have been the victims of problems with the infamous old Walk Bridge along Metro North in Norwalk), etc. begs the question “Is this really a blindness issue?”.  I have read, for example, in my local newspaper (thank you Newsline, BESB, and the Blackford Foundation!) that a constitutional amendment to create a transportation lock box using specified tax dollars may be a matter of some debate; indeed, the question in the survey is worded in such a way as to potentially gain a particular response and seems to expose the author’s political opinion—and of course if I get to vote on it in November I certainly will demand that the Vote by Phone machine be ready and working early so I can vote however I ultimately decide and know that the NFB is fully behind that demand…  I am reminded of a National Convention resolution many years ago advocating for more Amtrak funding that failed because the convention—I think correctly—thought it crossed this fine line (but be assured we demand Amtrak’s ap, website, and vending machines be accessible no matter how often or where the trains go).  Now, what would we do if bus service to, say, BESB’s office was to be impacted…  I realize that all of this may be theoretical at this point, though, but it’s always something I’ve viewed with great care as a Federationist though I am personally (and to some degree professionally) passionate about: from advocating on everything from bus routes to commuter and Amtrak train funding to whether Uber should be allowed to operate in New York City.  Very best,Nathanael    From: Ct-nfb [mailto:ct-nfb-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Justin Salisbury via Ct-nfb
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 2:06 AM
To: 'ct-nfb at nfbnet.org'
Cc: Justin Salisbury
Subject: [Ct-nfb] Connecticut Transportation Survey  Fellow Federationists:  My local representative to the Connecticut General Assembly sent me this survey about new transportation proposals. It’s important for us to voice our opinions!  Take the transportation survey by clicking here.   That survey includes a proposal for a new light rail system between Hartford and UConn’s Storrs campus. A light rail, for those who don’t know, is basically an above-ground subway. The survey also mentions buses and rail service.  Enjoy!  Justin SalisburyLegislative CoordinatorNFB of Connecticut      Justin Salisbury, NOMC, NCUEBGraduate StudentProfessional Development and Research Institute on BlindnessLouisiana Tech UniversityEmail: President at Alumni.ECU.eduLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=325734822Twitter: @SalisburyJustin  "None can be free as long as any are enslaved"   Dr. Kenneth Jernigan  
_______________________________________________
Ct-nfb mailing list
Ct-nfb at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Ct-nfb:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org/rmcgaffin%40snet.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org/attachments/20160201/b3521370/attachment.html>