[Electronics-talk] waiving $30 internet package with Verizon Droid, cause not fully accessible?

[Christopher Chaltain]

I'm not a Verizon customer, but I do support John's efforts. I think 
John has a valid point. I think the point is more clear on AT&T, which 
by the way, doesn't require a blind person to have a data plan if they 
purchase a smart phone. If a blind person wants an accessible phone, and 
if the only accessible phones are smart phones where a data plan is 
required, but they don't want a data plan then why should they be forced 
to pay for a data plan just to get an accessible phone? I think the 
issue is a bit cloudier on Verizon because you do have the option of the 
LG phones, but I don't think they're as accessible as the smart phones 
running Talks or Mobile Speak.

Obviously, if you're using the data plan you should pay for it, but if 
you don't use it you shouldn't have to pay for it just to get an 
accessible phone.

--

Christopher
chaltain at gmail.com


On 7/8/2010 4:46 PM, Alan Siman wrote:
> I think you are missing the point on the smart phone side for the 
> larger accessibility issue.
>
> Do you expect all phones to be accessible or all the ones you want?
>
> The HTC Ozone is fully accessible, the LG9200 is pretty much 
> accessible up to text messaging and most menus, and the LG8360 gives 
> you an accessible phone without texting.
>
> You do not have to have an android phone to get accessibility. And all 
> people who buy the phone pay the data plan cost.
>
> More interesting is why Verizon is charging 9.95 for the LG phones 
> which cannot access email or internet with voice accessibility.
>
> On 7/8/2010 2:28 PM, John Riehl wrote:
>> Tom, I am a Verizon customer and lodged an informal complaint with 
>> Verizon
>> because of the $30 additional data charge for obtaining the HTC Ozone 
>> phone.
>> Verizon attempted to satisfy me by waiving the data charge for three 
>> months
>> and allowing me to move to another carrier prior to the expiration 
>> date of
>> my contract if I wasn't satisfied with their accessibility. I am now
>> deciding whether to lodge a formal, legal complaint with the FCC 
>> formally
>> charging Verizon with violating section 255 of the communications 
>> Act, which
>> requires that they provide fully accessible technology "if readily
>> achievable". Mya rgument would be that all they have to do is waive 
>> the $30
>> a month data charge. I haven't decided what to do yet, as making a 
>> formal
>> complaint involves probably hiring an attorney.
>>
>>
>> John Riehl
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org
>> [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Tom Evans
>> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 1:38 PM
>> To: 'Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances'
>> Subject: [Electronics-talk] waiving $30 internet package with Verizon
>> Droid,cause not fully accessible?
>>
>> Is it possible or anyone having the droid and Verizon $30 monthly charge
>> waived cause not fully accessible?
>>
>> If so, then I assume no features could ever be updated?
>> Just want to use as a mini computer, outlook contacts and phone, 
>> don't need
>> internet.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Electronics-talk:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/realman02% 
>>
>> 40comcast.net
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
>> signature
>> database 5263 (20100708) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
>> signature
>> database 5263 (20100708) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
>> signature
>> database 5263 (20100708) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>> Electronics-talk:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/alansiman%40cox.net 
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Electronics-talk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/chaltain%40gmail.com 
>