[Electronics-Talk] My Review of the ProxTalker Electronics BrailleLabeler

[Pamela Dominguez]

It's just another way of labelling, that's all.  Pam.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Star Gazer via Electronics-Talk
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:02 PM
To: 'Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances'
Cc: Star Gazer
Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] My Review of the ProxTalker Electronics 
BrailleLabeler

Thank you.
I'm still trying to understand what this labeler does that you can't do with
a Perkins brailler and dymo tape? What am I not understanding?

-----Original Message-----
From: Electronics-Talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of David Andrews via Electronics-Talk
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 5:54 PM
To: Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances
<electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
Cc: David Andrews <dandrews at visi.com>
Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] My Review of the ProxTalker Electronics
Braille Labeler

It doesn't Braille on paper, it uses dymo tape.

Dave

At 04:39 PM 12/31/2015, you wrote:
>                                 Vince, I'm curious to know why/how you
>got this labeler? Was it a gift?
>Also, what sort of paper do you use?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Electronics-Talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>Behalf Of cheez via Electronics-Talk
>Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 10:28 PM
>To: Electronic Talks <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
>Cc: cheez <cheez at cox.net>
>Subject: [Electronics-Talk] My Review of the ProxTalker Electronics
>Braille Labeler
>
>Well, I've received the electronic braille labeler from ProxTalker, and
>here is what I think of this gadget.
>Perhaps I'll tell you what I like about it first.
>
>It makes beautiful braille.  The dots are well prominent.  I like the
>way they feel when reading.  And since metal pins are used for the
>embossing, duration should be much longer than plastic pins.
>
>The weight isn't too bad.  Probably in the neighborhood of a Pac Mate.
>
>I like the "done" beep the unit issues when it is finished embossing.
>I also like the fact that the unit will emit a series of beeps if it is
>turned on accidentally when in a backpack.  I had this happen to me
>once.  It took me a couple of minutes to realize where the beeps were
>coming from.  Since the power button is a toggle switch, the unit can
>be turned on rather easily.
>
>Now since I didn't purchase the qwerty keyboard the company offers, I
>don't know how it performs when using that peripheral.  But I assume
>the result wouldn't be any different.
>Now what I don't like about the electronic labeler.
>
>The shape.  I find the kidney shape rather odd.  I expected it to be
>rectangular.  Even oblong would have been fine.  But kidney?  Even the
>lady that took my order said she was taken aback when she saw the shape
>for the first time.
>
>The speed.  It is surprisingly slow.  I thought it would be faster than
>what it is.  When I brailled a label with my granddude's name on it, it
>took about 5 seconds to finish the 3 letters I wrote!  To reiterate
>what I said above.  I don't think a qwerty keyboard would speed up the
>performance.  And speaking of the qwerty keyboard.  I was disappointed
>that a micro USB adaptor wasn't included.  But I guess they get a
>percentage from Dell for the sale of the qwerty keyboard they offer.
>
>They say a carrying case can be used.  However, no such case exist for
>the labeler.  I was told there is one in development.  Availability is
>to be announced.
>
>There are 2 hooks for a neck strap, which the company does not offer
either.
>
>Although the unit can run on ac power, the ac adaptor is not included
>in the package.
>
>I found it queer that the unit has an audio jack installed.  I asked
>why, and I was told that other features were under consideration during
>the production.  But nothing never came to fruition.
>[My assumption is, an MP3 player was one feature.  I would have
>suggested a microphone jack for speech input.]
>
>I assume, since there weren't any braille or audio instructions for the
>unit, this was geared more for a non-braille reader/user.  The manual
>has a chart showing how to make braille letters.
>
>Overall, I like the labeler.  I don't have to worry about label
>imperfections.  However, I feel, that for $599 ac and USB adaptors
>should have been included.  I also think a lock button would have been
>nice to prevent accidental activations.  One may not hear the beep if
>one is in a noisy environment.  I remove one battery when it is in my
backpack.
>Another thing about the price.  At last check, a brailler cost about
>$200 more than this labeler.  but that's technology.
>
>So that's it.  I have nothing more to say.  I do use it at work.
>That's what I got it for anyway.
>
>Vince

         David Andrews and long white cane Harry.
E-Mail:  dandrews at visi.com or david.andrews at nfbnet.org


_______________________________________________
Electronics-Talk mailing list
Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Electronics-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/pickrellrebecc
a%40gmail.com


_______________________________________________
Electronics-Talk mailing list
Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
Electronics-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/geodom%40optonline.net


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6176 / Virus Database: 4489/11296 - Release Date: 12/31/15