[Electronics-Talk] future of accessibility in appliances and devices
Jude DaShiell
jdashiel at panix.com
Fri Nov 11 03:13:12 UTC 2016
If the screen is a grafene screen, it will react to heat with cold
fingers that screen works poorly or not at all. The android tablet I
have hasn't got a grafene screen lg gpad 700 and it's effected by static
discharge. I don't know what the screen technology is on that one. I
proved all of this by wearing a pair of static discharge gloves. The
android tablet worked perfectly well with those on, bbut wearing them
and trying to use my iPhone wouldn't even work the screen. So you may
want to go in a room with a rug and rub your feet with shoes on on the
rug if it will produce a static charge then try doing something with
that device and if that fails, warm up your hands very well to where
they're noticeably warm and then try the device. One of these two
possibilities may work unless a third kind of touch screen is in use by
your device.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Arlene via Electronics-Talk wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:33:38
> From: Arlene via Electronics-Talk <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
> To: S L Johnson <SLJohnson25 at comcast.net>,
> Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances
> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: Arlene <arlenes71154 at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] future of accessibility in appliances and
> devices
>
> I'm not opposed to the touch screen technology, and as much as I've tried
> with the modo g phone, I'm not getting the knack of it. That's one way to
> say it. Of course I don't have the phone connected right now though I'm not
> giving up on it. I've listened to podcasts for touch screen phones and I was
> on the android list for a period of time, but so far as stupid as it might
> sound to those of you that haveieither or both the i phone or android, that
> are accomplished in navigating and can use the touch screen. About the best
> way to explain it, so far anyway, I'm not getting the feel for it yet,
> though I really hope tooeventually, and it's not because I don't want to get
> into using a touch screen. That's part of the key, for me anyway, not yet
> have I've gotten the touch of working the touch screen with ease as many
> people do, and as much as I want too. There's aspects and features of what
> you can do with both the i-phones and the androids which I know I could do
> right now, if I only had the knack of it including the valuable and
> important and access to different bits of information and so on. While
> there's an app for everything, an app here, and an app there, everywhere an
> app, app, it seems like everyone in the whole world has a smart phone. It's
> true a majority of people that have cell phones do have smart phones which is
> really great. It's also true not everyone as one, as mentioned for not having
> the funds to buy a smart phone, and some of it, there's a number of
> individuals are doing there best to attempt to get the right touch or knack
> to even navigate and work a touch screen. So really it's not out of a case
> that there's necessarily groups of people that don't want to move along to a
> touch screen and or smart phone. There may be some that will never get a
> smart phone, not being a priority for them personally as crazy and stupid as
> it might sound. For some people, change and new things aren't always embraced
> immediately, and in time whatever the new thing is found not to be so
> complicated or a bad thing. I don't know what all the right answers are, but
> as others have said there should bea some way to make appliances and other
> machines accessible for anyone to use, even if it's a mix of the old and new
> technology. The stoves we looked at for example, were fine in the way that
> for the oven to set the temperature it would beep as you set the temperature
> and as you set it on either bake, and or broil and so on. If you're setting
> the temperature and you loose track you could always turn it off and do it
> again. To me anyway, with newer technology it's acceptable where this type of
> stove is concerned. The stove top was very much like an older stove from what
> I remember which was good. As far as the affordability of the smart phones
> and defending that aspect, for android anyway, The modo g and probably some
> other models of android phones are pretty inexpensive compared to what an i
> phone and other android phones cost. I'm not an expert on all the prices, but
> the modo g was $170, and I purchased it from walmart as a prepaid phone on
> family mobile which is the walmart phone that is on the t-mobile lines. I
> think what would help me in getting use to my modo g is to find a friend
> nearby that's experienced with touch screens that can sit with me as I
> navigate the screen. They could help me and instruct me with whatever my
> simple attempts are, pointing out what I'm doing wrong and they could show
> me how to have the right touch for it. It's something I will do as I find
> someone. I do have some friends in mind. I first really wanted to see what I
> could figure out on my own. One time a sales guy from a t and t store, spent
> 45 minutes with me in the store showing me his i phone, turning voice over on
> for me, and letting me explore the screen, as he was explaining things to me.
> It was such a great experience. At the time my friend and I each purchased
> the t-199 samsung feature phone, she purchased a tablet. now I wished I asked
> her to put talkback on for me, at least some of the time, because, while she
> didn't need talkback, she would have helped me in getting use too it. We have
> that sort of friendship where we enjoy working on things together. We both
> only knew about talkback from another friend of ours. Our other friend
> familiarized herself with talk back on her s3 due to having tumors in her
> eyes in case she did loose her vision, and we all could have worked on that.
> As I said The 3 of us had that sort of friendship. Even starting with the
> gusto 2 and then when we got the gusto 3 and then when we got the t-199 for
> t-mobile we worked on a lot of things with one another. In fact when we each
> purchased the t-199, we didn't know that it had speech built into it. We did
> find out a day later when one of my friends was exploring the screen and all
> the menues. I'm sure I can find someone where I am now, since we both moved
> away from that apartment building. So it's not always because people don't
> want to know,don't have the desire to learn touch screens, and yes some are
> somewhat affordable. At times you just need to save up for important things.
> Even the modo g at $170 may be to much of an expense of an item to buy in one
> month. If it's that important even to buy, the best thing to do is save up
> for it.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "S L Johnson via Electronics-Talk"
> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
> To: "Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances"
> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: "S L Johnson" <SLJohnson25 at comcast.net>
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] future of accessibility in appliances and
> devices
>
>
>> Jim:
>>
>> Okay, the smart phone may be one way to have access but, manufacturers
>> still should make heir appliances accessible. Not every blind or visually
>> impaired person, especially aging seniors, can afford a smart phone. Also
>> many seniors are not comfortable with the new touch screen technology.
>>
>> Sandra Johnson
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Jim McCarthy via Electronics-Talk
>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:41 AM
>> To: 'Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances'
>> Cc: Jim McCarthy
>> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] future of accessibility in appliances and
>> devices
>>
>> Sandra,
>> The smart phone providing access to appliances actually might prove helpful
>> to you given what you describe. That is if you had access to a qwerty
>> keyboard or braille display. The majority of touch screen gestures and
>> methods do have keyboard equivalents. I agree with Dave that smart phone
>> access to appliances would be one more access tool and it also seems one
>> that the appliance manufacture community might pursue.
>> Jim McCarthy
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Electronics-Talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>> Behalf Of Sandra Streeter via Electronics-Talk
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 9:46 PM
>> To: electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> Cc: Sandra Streeter
>> Subject: [Electronics-Talk] future of accessibility in appliances and
>> devices
>>
>> All in for a range of solutions! I, for one, have had a devil of a time
>> mastering any touch-screen device (except my microwave), because I??Tm a
>> lousy auditory learner who needs both Braille and practice to master even a
>> smartphone, and because I have some fine-motor issues that make it harder
>> to ensure that I??Tm, say, double-tapping something instead of tapping once
>> and accidentally moving my finger without knowing it, then attempting the
>> second half of the gesture (in the new place I wasn??Tt aware I was in).
>> Those of us who are still button-pushers, and don??Tt want to use touch
>> screens or to talk to a device, are left out in the cold. . Smartphones
>> would not be an option for me. Besides which, say the Internet part of the
>> grid (but not all electronic areas) went down??"getting our phones to talk
>> to our devices so we can set them properly might be a major issue. And, I
>> am totally in agreement that we need to be better advocates for ourselves,
>> instead of waiting for a politician or governmental system to finally
>> see/do something about our needs. Not all de-regulation is a bad thing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sandra
>>
>> Not ??oRevelation??? ??" tis ??" that waits
>> But our unfurnished eyes ??"
>> (Emily Dickinson)
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-Talk mailing list
>> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Electronics-Talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/jmccarthy%40mdtap.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-Talk mailing list
>> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Electronics-Talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/sljohnson25%40comcast.net
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-Talk mailing list
>> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Electronics-Talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/arlenes71154%40earthlink.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/jdashiel%40panix.com
>
--
More information about the Electronics-Talk
mailing list