[Faith-talk] Baffling Bible Questions Answered for Monday, August 1, 2016
Paul Smith
paulsmith at samobile.net
Mon Aug 1 18:07:04 UTC 2016
Hello and good day to my astute Bible students out there. Hope your
day is going well, by God's matchless grace and His providential care,
and that my compatriots are staying cool on this summer day.
Like last week, we have two books to deal with, namely, Micah and
Nahum, so let's begin with Micah.
Question: Who wrote this book, and what themes and issues does it deal with?
Answer: The prophet Micah was a contemporary of Isaiah and ministered
in Judah between 750 and 686 B.C. The book alternates between
predictions of judgment and words of hope. While God rejects idolatry,
injustice and ritualism, He gladly pardons the penitent. Another major
theme of Micah is that David's kingdom would be restored and enlarged
under the coming Messiah.
Micah 6:6-8
Question: How are these verses to be understood? It sounds as if a
person can be saved if he or she will "act justly ... love mercy and
... and walk humbly with ... God."
Answer: It is always important to interpret any verse or passage in
its context. This verse is addressed to people who, through descent
from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, are in a special covenant relationship
with God. However, to fulfill their obligation under God's law, these
covenant people were called to a life of justice, mercy, and
responsiveness to God. This prophet, like Amos, Isaiah, and many
others, is deeply disturbed because God's people assume that they can
win God's favor with ritual and sacrifice while ignoring the moral and
social dimensions of a walk with God.
These same words might well be addressed to Christians today. They lay
a foundation for any believer who seeks to live in fellowship with the
Lord. They are not addressed to unbelievers, nor does it lay out a way
of salvation or imply that a person's behavior is the basis of eternal
salvation.
NAHUM
Question: Who wrote this book, and what themes and issues does it deal with?
Answer: Nothing is known of the author, whose name means "comfort of
the Lord." Most believe Nahum wrote between the fall of Thebes in 663
B.C., mentioned in 3:8-10, and the fall of Nineveh in 612 B.C. His
words, spoken against the Assyrian capital, were intended to comfort
Judah, which had been threatened by its great northern neighbor for decades.
Nahum 1:2, 3
Question: How can we reconcile Nahum's portrayal of God as "jealous
and avenging" with the notion of a God of love? How can we explain the
note of joy in this book over the bloody destruction of Nineveh?
Answer: This common moral argument is based on several faulty
assumptions. First is the assumption that a God of love cannot at the
same time be a God who metes out terrible judgment on sin. Both the
Old and New Testaments make it clear that this is a false assumption.
Second is the assumption that vengeance in itself is sinful. While it
is true that human beings are not to take revenge, the Bible clearly
reserves for God not only the right but the obligation to take
vengeance on sinners. Thus, Paul quotes the Old Testament by saying,
"It is Mine to avenge; I will repay, says the Lord" (Rom. 12:19).
God's vengeance cannot be criticized as long as it is not confused with
vindictive retaliation. Finally, the note of joy sounded in this book
is completely understandable. The prophet's people have been
threatened for decades by one of the most cruel, destructive peoples
known to the ancient world. Who would not rejoice to see the threat
removed and the persecutor of many nations humbled at last?
And there you have this week's baffling Bible questions answered column
for this week. Hoping that the reading and meditating on it was a
blessing for you, may the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob just keep us
safe, individually and collectively, in these last days in which we
live. Lord willing, tomorrow in this space the articles will resume.
Your Christian friend and brother, Paul
More information about the Faith-Talk
mailing list