[musictlk] music production

[Jorge Paez]

Hi Steve:
Thanks for the info, I'll look into it.

And yes, I will agree with you.

Even when I've been on Apple's machines for the last few years if I have to use a Windows computer for any reason, I always use JAWS.

Its simply the best out there for Windows.

Anyway, thanks for the info, and I'll let you know what I end up buying.

Jorge


On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:00 PM, Steven Jeffrey wrote:

> George,
> 
> Great! Once again, in my oppinion, you can't go wrong with Sonar/CT.
> 
> As for computers, aside from my custom built one, I don't have any experience with any of the others. I had mine built by a computer -geek type dude, he researched what the DAW's had in them , and built me a comparable box, and charged a very fair rate.
> 
> If you want a notebook, I'd recommend not getting a mass produced one, but one specifically designed for audio recording/production... again, any decent computer-geek type that spends the time to research notebook DAW's can build one for you.
> 
> If you don't mind spending the extra cash, there are plenty of companies that build DAW's, usually nothing wrong with them, they just cost a little more, and they could build you a powerful DAW notebook as well.
> 
> When if comes to audio production, Windows often gets a tough ride, but a good Windows DAW can do what the MAC does, and believe it or not, if built right, can out perform a Mac... I know this to be true, I have one.
> 
> Oppinion here again... JAWS is by far the best screen-reader  available ( I've tried them all,) and when it comes time to do music, JAWS and Sonar/CT will always be a very reliable and solid way to get music done!
> 
> For me, the end result is what it's all about, and again, you just can't go wrong with the combination of JAWS/Sonar/CT for recording/mixing/producing music.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jorge Paez" <jorgeapaez at mac.com>
> To: "NFBnet Music Talk Mailing List" <musictlk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [musictlk] music production
> 
> 
>> Hi Steve:
>> Thanks for your recommendation.
>> That's exactly what I wish to do as a profession myself, I want to be an audio/music producer.
>> 
>> What computer is a good fit for Sonar?
>> What tech specs should I look out for?
>> 
>> Also, when considering a laptop, what company do you think is durable?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:36 PM, Steven Jeffrey wrote:
>> 
>>> George,
>>> 
>>> As a long-time Sonar/Caketalking user, I would highly recommend Sonar/CT for recording/production.
>>> 
>>> As you know, every program has a learning curve, but when it comes to ease of use, and what you can actually do within the program, Sonar/CT in my oppinion can't be beat!
>>> 
>>> Just so you know, I'm a long-time JAWS/Sonar/Ct user, so my oppinions/recommendations will of course sway that way, but I also work professionally recording/mixing/producing using them, they have made it possible for me to do those things. They've allowed me to do everything I need to do and then some.
>>> 
>>> Give them a try with the right computer, and you'll know exactly what I, and so many others  are talking about.
>>> 
>>> Steve
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jorge Paez" <jorgeapaez at mac.com>
>>> To: "NFBnet Music Talk Mailing List" <musictlk at nfbnet.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 4:53 PM
>>> Subject: [musictlk] music production
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hi all:
>>>> I'm just wondering,
>>>> I am currently stuck with Logic,
>>>> and have searched for help on this list re: protools,
>>>> but would like to know,
>>>> in the long term,
>>>> in terms of music production,
>>>> what software seems to provide the most accessibility and ease of use?
>>>> Pro Tools or Sonar?
>>>> 
>>>> I haven't used Windows in a long time but would be interested to hear
>>>> what people who have experienced both Sonar and Protools (either on Windows or Mac) have to say.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Jorge
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> musictlk mailing list
>>>> musictlk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/musictlk_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for musictlk:
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/musictlk_nfbnet.org/shjeffrey%40charter.net
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> musictlk mailing list
>>> musictlk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/musictlk_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for musictlk:
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/musictlk_nfbnet.org/jorgeapaez%40mac.com
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> musictlk mailing list
>> musictlk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/musictlk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for musictlk:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/musictlk_nfbnet.org/shjeffrey%40charter.net 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> musictlk mailing list
> musictlk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/musictlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for musictlk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/musictlk_nfbnet.org/jorgeapaez%40mac.com