[nabs-l] Security in ourselves, acceptance in others

Kirt Manwaring kirt.crazydude at gmail.com
Sat May 28 19:08:36 UTC 2011


Mike,
  Fair enough.  I was exhagerating a little.  But I think we can take
the comparison too far if we aren't careful.

On 5/28/11, Mike Freeman <k7uij at panix.com> wrote:
> Kirt:
>
> I doubt there's a person in or out of the Federation that would say "the
> blind are just like African-americans". Methinks we're making a mountain out
> of a molehill here. What we've actually said was and is that we, the blind,
> are a minority in a social context as are also racial minorities, women,
> gays and lesbians and so on. We suffer many types of discrimination similar
> in many respects to the forms of discrimination these other mainorities
> suffer. That's quite different than saying we're just like other minorities.
> To some, this is splitting hairs but remember that our founding president
> was a lawyer! (grin)
>
> Mike
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
> Of Kirt Manwaring
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 11:25 AM
> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Security in ourselves, acceptance in others
>
> Darian,
>   I don't see anything wrong with using the comparison to prove a point-I
> do, however, see a lot wrong when people think our situations were exactly
> the same.  To my knowledge, no leader in the blind civil rights movement has
> been assassinated.  I'm not afraid I'll get linched by an angry mob when I
> go to Washington Seminar.  I'm not worried I'll be grabbed in the middle of
> the night by the KKK and beaten to death because I'm a Federationist or, for
> that matter, because I'm blind.
>   I'm not saying there aren't similarities; indeed, comparing the two
> situations can give us valuable insights sometimes.  But whenever we start
> saying "we're just like these people because they went through so much
> abuse," I'm afraid we're starting to go down the slippery slope of
> entitlement and demanding superior access.
>   Just my thoughts,
> Kirt
>
> On 5/28/11, Darian Smith <dsmithnfb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Firstly,
>>   I feel like someone being beatin down because they are a
>> federationest is no different than  someone being beatin down because
>> they  were a black  panther, so to me while valid, it's  different in
>> that  it's a  subsection of blind people, as the panthers were of
>> black people  I don't doubt that people are unaware of all of what
>> went down that effected the blind americian expirience, as we are
>> largely unaware of alot of the minority expiriencesinour country.
>> Fact is that for the
>> sake of  this  comparison, blacks faced    constent threats on their
>> lives, and even up until now they still do.  I don't know how many
>> blind people have to worry about  the police stopping them  because
>> they "look like trouble".  I don't write this to  play "who has the
>> worst life", rather to say that some could find fault in the
>> comparison.  For my part, I don't quite know if I agree with it at
>> this time.
>>  Respectfully,
>>   Darian
>>
>> On 5/28/11, Kirt Manwaring <kirt.crazydude at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Mike,
>>>   In the African-american struggle for huma rights, there were/are
>>> lots of different philosophies and approaches taken by a lot of
>>> different people-you probably know more about that than me having
>>> lived through a lot of the craziness.  Do you think more could've
>>> happened faster if...say, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X spent less
>>> time bickering and more time cooperating or, at the very least,
>>> ignoring each other?  I'm not denying that both of them did a lot to
>>> better the condition of black people...but imagine what could've
>>> happened if the two of them didn't take so long to reconcile-or, if
>>> nothing else, if they didn't spend time attacking each others'
>>> philosophies and devoted that energy to their respective movements?
>>>   Could that comparison be aplicable to us?  Am I remiss when I say
>>> that we in NFB sometimes spend too much time attacking the
>>> philosophies of other blind people rather than advancing our own
>>> philosophy?  Am I remiss in saying that many in the ACB spend more
>>> time trying to tear down the Federation instead of building up the
>>> Council?  Why can't we, if nothing else, leave each other alone and
>>> spend all our time working on our own goals?
>>>   Maybe we could take that comparison further, to incolude individual
>>> blind people who disagree with us.  Ideally we should try to engage
>>> in constructive dialogue and find some sort of common ground with
>>> people who disagree and, for example, have next to no travel or daily
>>> living skills.  After all, we hope they'll "see the light", so to
>>> speak, and become empowered with good training.  But let's say they
>>> don't accept our philosophy...whether they're compitent blind people
>>> or not, let's say they want nothing to do with the Federation.  I say
>>> first we try and learn whatever we can from them, no matter their
>>> skills and atitude (or lack thereof).  Once we've learned something
>>> from them, even if it's as simple as "I need to have better cane
>>> skills" or "this guy has terrible hygiene-at least I know now why
>>> it's so important to take showers!", then I think we try and let them
>>> learn from us.  That can either be  by talking or by them looking at
>>> our example...if they chose to not accept our world view, there's no
>>> reason to get angry and defensive.  There is still probably common
>>> ground somewhere and, even in the highly unlikely event you can't
>>> find any (which is probably due to you not looking hard enough), just
> ignore the person and move on.
>>> If we can't be friends, there's no reason to be enemies...live and
>>> let live, and all that jazz.
>>>   Warmly,
>>> Kirt
>>>
>>> On 5/28/11, Mike Freeman <k7uij at panix.com> wrote:
>>>> I know of no site that has everything gathered in one place.
>>>> However, you could do worse than to read Dr. Floyd Matson's book,
>>>> "Walking Alone and marching together" (available on the NFB website
>>>> and via the NLS Web-braille
>>>> site) and, if you'd wish to see the alternative point-of-view, James
>>>> McGivern's "People of Vision: a History of the american Council of
>>>> the Blind", also available from the NLS Web-braille and BARD sites.
>>>>
>>>> It might also behoove us all to reread or re-listen-to the NFB
>>>> convention banquet speechdes of Drs. tenBroke, Jernigan and Maurer.
>>>>
>>>> I know that's a lot of reading but no one ever said Federationism
>>>> was easy!
>>>> (huge grin)
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org]
>>>> On Behalf Of Josh Gregory
>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 10:07 AM
>>>> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>>>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Security in ourselves, acceptance in others
>>>>
>>>> Is there a site with...  the history of blind people and what they
>>>> went through? I'm curious now, this is a good thread.
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>> sent from my Apex
>>>> Email: joshkart12 at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com
>>>> To: "'National Association of Blind Students mailing list'"
>>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>> Date sent: Sat, 28 May 2011 09:52:47 -0700
>>>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Security in ourselves, acceptance in others
>>>>
>>>> Although I was never subject to one, I can still remember when, at
>>>> late as the 1960's, welfare workers conducted "night raids" with the
>>>> help of the police wherein said workers would visit blind clients
>>>> and go through their homes to make sure that nothing had been bought
>>>> that would indicate that the clients had unreported income.  This
>>>> extended even to such items as a new dress.
>>>>
>>>> I echo Briley's sentiments that many today have no concept of what
>>>> went down in the past.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>>> [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Briley Pollard
>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 7:28 AM
>>>> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>>>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Security in ourselves, acceptance in others
>>>>
>>>> I think it is not always an appropriate comparison to say our
>>>> struggle for civil rights isn't completely parallel with the black
>>>> American experience, but we have struggled for civil rights.  Go
>>>> read some history on how blind people have been treated by families
>>>> and institutions over the years.  Blind children were targets for
>>>> sexual assault in extremely high numbers because they were
>>>> considered to be vulnerable.  They were placed in horrific living
>>>> conditions throughout history in institutions because families
>>>> believed that blindness was equal to ineffectiveness, and that
>>>> they'd never be able to succeed or help out their relatives.  As a
>>>> people group, we have suffered many indignities that I don't think
>>>> the current generation of blind people even come close to realizing.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Briley
>>>> On May 28, 2011, at 1:23 AM, Darian Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Mike:
>>>>  African-Americans/blacks (however one choosses to term
>>>> themselves)would not have been too keen on the idea based upon how
>>>> they were treated by whites  up to that time.
>>>>   It is curious that how    african-americans were treated is
>>>> always
>>>>  one of the first ways we as blind  people choose to make our
>>>> comparisons in our struggle  for first-class citizanship.  I wonder,
>>>> were blind people  beatin and hosed down when they peacefully
>>>> protest  the unjust ways they were treated? Were  they lybnched?
>>>> Can we safely  make those  comparisons?  unless  I am missing
>>>> something (I could be,  and it wouldn't be the first or last time I
>>>> have), we  have some  similarities with regards to civil rights, but
>>>> largely our histories  were quite different and  the scars,
>>>> deaths,risks were felt on largely  different levels.
>>>>  Just  some thoughts on  the matter,and I very much appreciate the
>>>> question.
>>>>   Respectfully,
>>>>   Darian
>>>>
>>>>  On 5/26/11, Mike Freeman <k7uij at panix.com> wrote:
>>>>  Darian:
>>>>
>>>>  What do  you think African-americans would have said during the
>>>> 1950's and 1960's had one of their number said he/she would rather
>>>> date a Caucasian person because of the concern for two black persons
>>>> dating?
>>>>
>>>>  Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>>  From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>>> [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On  Behalf Of Darian Smith
>>>>  Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 5:49 PM
>>>>  To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>>>>  Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Security in ourselves, acceptance in others
>>>>
>>>>  Jedi,
>>>>   Sure-let me see...
>>>>  We as federationests have certain ways that we like to deal with
>>>> situations, ways that we see life or phrase things in life.  For
>>>> example We like to use  the term "blind"  as opposed to "visually
>>>> impaired" or any variant there of.  We also like if a person uses
>>>> products with Braille  on them (braille watches, braille compass,
>>>> braille books and the like, but somehow we tend to make people who
>>>> don't utilize these things seem lesser for not.
>>>>   I have a friend who would much rather date a sighted  gentleman
>>>> than  a blind gentleman because she is concerned about the idea of
>>>> two  blind people dating.
>>>>   Personally I may feel a certain way about  these things, but I
>>>> would  like to think that  it's  huge to  consider where each person
>>>> is in
>>>>  their life and  accept them into the  fold as they are.    I am
>>>> fine
>>>>  with educatinn,  so long as  we arn't critical and that we are
>>>> accepting, because  seems to me that weas people hate to be told
>>>> that we are "wrong"
>>>>  for thinking like we do.
>>>>   Does that make sense?
>>>>   Respecgfully,
>>>>   Darian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On 5/26/11, Darian Smith <dsmithnfb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>  Very good points.
>>>>   We as blind people are a minority, and I think it's  good to
>>>> remember that  there are other minorities out there.  How does one
>>>> member of a minority group address another member of that same group
>>>> if they don't feel that this person is acting like they should in
>>>> public?  Don't feel like this person is projecting a positive image
>>>> of the rest of that group to society?
>>>>     I believe that we all face that problem and how we deal with it
>>>> varies, but I would hope that we know enough to not  take  it upon
>>>> ourselves to change the worlds opinions.  I think we can model that
>>>> positive image that is with in our grasp to become, that probably is
>>>> the  healthiest way to approach this  idea of perception-changing
>>>> that we  think about alot,  Does that make sense?
>>>>   thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>  On 5/26/11, Jedi <loneblindjedi at samobile.net> wrote:
>>>>  Excellent points.
>>>>
>>>>  I'm going to add to that some.
>>>>
>>>>  I've noticed that we also tend to judge a person's actions when
>>>> they attempt to handle a vexing situation like overhelpfulness or
>>>> discrimination.  I've been doing some research on the effects of
>>>> such judgment and have concluded that it creates an invisible
>>>> audience for the blind person in question.  This audience is made of
>>>> both the blind and the sighted community and creates thoughts like
>>>> "What will my blind friends and colleagues think of me if I react
>>>> this or that way?
>>>>  What will the sighted person I'm talking to think? What will
>>>> sighted bystanders think?" What this does is create a win/lose
>>>> situation where the stakes are high.  Aside from causing stress that
>>>> limits problem-solving ability, this high stakes situation also
>>>> creates a greater likelihood of negative response to perceived
>>>> threats to the blind person's self-concept and sense of efficacy in
>>>> the interaction.
>>>>  So for example, an overly helpful person might cause a blind person
>>>> to feel ineffective as it is.  But the invisible audience concept
>>>> boosts that feeling considerably because of the stress involved
>>>> with feeling like they have to show themselves as both effective
>>>> and graceful in handling both the offers of help and the person
>>>> who's offering it.  Is any of this making sense? So the bottom line
>>>> is that by trying to be the perfect ambassador for the blind, we
>>>> may be shooting ourselves in the foot by creating such a high
>>>> stakes situation in our mind that the stress lowers our ability to
>>>> present the cool, calm, and effective image we want to offer to the
>>>> public.
>>>>
>>>>  On that note, I've noticed that our community seems to have it in
>>>> our heads that we're responsible for how the sighted feel about us.
>>>>  The truth is that there are limits to that responsibility.
>>>> Sure, we
>>>>  want to set a good impression in all areas, but so does everyone
>>>> else.  The sad truth is that we are judged based on the actions of
>>>> one person.
>>>>  But the thing is, there's nothing that we can really do about that
>>>> except to expose a given sighted person to the diversity of our
>>>> population.  Even if we set the perfect impression, it's likely that
>>>> the sighted person will still stereotype by saying that we're all
>>>> amazing or that the one individual in question is the exception to
>>>> a rule.  It seems to me that the only people who really get that
>>>> we're as diverse as they are are those who know how to deconstruct
>>>> society's grand narrative or are those who have seen enough
>>>> diversity in our population to realize that they can't judge all of
>>>> us based on one  person.
>>>>
>>>>  Respectfully,
>>>>  Jedi
>>>>
>>>>  Original message:
>>>>  That makes perfect sense, but we should not fall into the trap of
>>>> taking responsibility for others' actions.  When we do that, we
>>>> lose sight of our own goals and direction in life.  Unless you're a
>>>> therapist, or a rehab teacher working with people like that, it is
>>>> not your job to fix them.  Even as a therapist or teacher, your
>>>> place is to be a mentor and an instructor.  As I previously said,
>>>> if that person, after being shown compassion and alternative ways
>>>> of thinking, doing and living chooses to fall back into old
>>>> patterns as soon as the instructor's back is turned, that shows a
>>>> lack of respect for everyone around them, including themselves.
>>>> So
>>>>  if a person wants to wallow in misery and self-pity, let them!
>>>>  That person will either fall hard when they find out their
>>>> parents/family members/significant other or what have you can't
>>>> take care of them forever, and then they'll realize what needs to
>>>> happen in due time, or they will get sick of the status quo and
>>>> want to change it.  And if people hold it against a decent blind
>>>> person because they've met a person like that in the past, it's  not
>>>> worth it to try and make them feel any differently.  They will
>>>> either come around in time or they  won't.  Choice is the key word
>>>> here.
>>>>  Everyone is free to think as they choose so long as it's not
>>>> hurting anyone.  So, while it might temporarily sting a bit to lose
>>>> out on a potential friendship due to someone's ignorance, as soon
>>>> as you meet someone who's worth your time, you forget about that
>>>> other person real quick
>>>>
>>>>  On 5/26/11, Daniel Romero <djdan567 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>  I think the reason why this might go down is because of the view
>>>> that we get from the public in general.  Most people who are
>>>> sighted are not used to a blind person.  You have to understand
>>>> that one blind person being seen is a huge thing.  They're now
>>>> reliable for what a person thinks about blind people.  They are  the
>>>> ones setting an example.  So if you have a blind person who  smells
>>>> bad, rocks, pokes their eyes or just do not have the  proper skills,
>>>> the outside person will make an assumtion and say  that all blind
>>>> people are like that.  i'm not saying it's right  for blind people
>>>> to call out other blind people with a skills set  that is lower then
>>>> theirs, they're just calling them out because  they are representing
>>>> blind people.  It puts a bad label on us  blind people who do take
>>>> care of ourselves, have the skills to be  independent and succeed.
>>>> like i said, i'm not saying it's right  but I don't think us who do
>>>> have the skills want to have a  negative conotation.  Not all blind
>>>> people poke their eyes, rock,  hop, twitch,bump into everything,
>>>> smell bad, do not clean their  own clothes, or anything like that.
>>>> So to be part of a group  that's going to display such a view that
>>>> is negative to the public, we fall right behind that.  Am I making
>>>> sense?
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  nabs-l mailing list
>>>>  nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>>  nabs-l:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/turtlepow
>>>>  er
>>>>  17%40gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  nabs-l mailing list
>>>>  nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>>  nabs-l:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/loneblind
>>>> j
>>>>  ed
>>>>  i%40samobile.net
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>  Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.
>>>> Visit
>>>>  www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  nabs-l mailing list
>>>>  nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>>  nabs-l:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dsmithnfb
>>>> %4
>>>>  0g
>>>>  mail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>  Darian Smith
>>>>  Skype: The_Blind_Truth
>>>>  Windows Live: Lightningrod2010 at live.com Follow me on twitter:
>>>>  http://twitter.com/goldengateace
>>>>
>>>>  "The purpose of life is a life of purpose.
>>>>
>>>>  - Robert Byrne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>  Darian Smith
>>>>  Skype: The_Blind_Truth
>>>>  Windows Live: Lightningrod2010 at live.com Follow me on twitter:
>>>>  http://twitter.com/goldengateace
>>>>
>>>>  "The purpose of life is a life of purpose.
>>>>
>>>>  - Robert Byrne
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  nabs-l mailing list
>>>>  nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>>  nabs-l:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40p
>>>> anix
>>>>  .com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  nabs-l mailing list
>>>>  nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>>  nabs-l:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dsmithnfb
>>>> %40g
>>>>  mail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>  Darian Smith
>>>>  Skype: The_Blind_Truth
>>>>  Windows Live: Lightningrod2010 at live.com Follow me on twitter:
>>>>  http://twitter.com/goldengateace
>>>>
>>>>  "The purpose of life is a life of purpose.
>>>>
>>>>  - Robert Byrne
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  nabs-l mailing list
>>>>  nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/brileyp%4
>>>> 0gmai
>>>>  l.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>> nabs-l:
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40p
>>>> anix.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for nabs-l:
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/joshkart1
>>>> 2%40gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>> nabs-l:
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40pani
>>>> x.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>>> nabs-l:
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/kirt.crazydu
>>>> de%40gmail.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> nabs-l:
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dsmithnfb%40g
>>> mail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Darian Smith
>> Skype: The_Blind_Truth
>> Windows Live: Lightningrod2010 at live.com Follow me on twitter:
>> http://twitter.com/goldengateace
>>
>> "The purpose of life is a life of purpose.
>>
>> - Robert Byrne
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/kirt.crazydude
>> %40gmail.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/kirt.crazydude%40gmail.com
>




More information about the NABS-L mailing list