[nabs-l] Grabbing and streetcrossing help
Carly
carlymih at earthlink.net
Sat Nov 12 13:45:29 UTC 2011
Good morning, Ashley,
To me, the term "sighted guide" ought not necessarily be reflective
of whether a person can ocularly, see, but a description of someone
fulfilling a role as a guide. For this reason I completely reject
that term, for my own use.
Things don't need to be defined into oblivion. At 03:40 PM
11/10/2011, Ashley Bramlett wrote:
>Mark,
>I agree with you. I go sighted guide a lot when walking and talking
>with another person. Its easier to keep in contact with them and
>faster. Also, if I I use my cane, it might trip them. If you follow
>them, where does the person stand so your cane isn't in the way? If
>they're ahead of you, they cannot see your cane arc. Do they walk
>behind and give directions?
>
>We cannot say we're independent and get a sighted guide everywhere
>we go. Yet, in
>some circumstances, I think sighted guide is appropriate. It just depends.
>IMO, independence means we're in control of where we go and what
>we're doing. So going out for dinner and grabbing an elbowof a
>companion seems reasonable. You made a decision where to go and how
>to get there and likely you'll use one group member as a reader of
>your bill and the menu.
>
>I guess we balance when to use a guide. Mark, yes you can hang on to
>a blind person. That is why they call it human guide now, not sighted guide.
>O&M instructors changed the term recognizing that blind people can
>and do guide each other.
>
>Ashley
>-----Original Message----- From: Marc Workman
>Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 6:26 PM
>To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Grabbing and streetcrossing help
>
>Jedi wrote,
>>we can't claim that we want to be independent travellers and ask
>>for a sighted guide everywhere we go.
>
>I take this to mean that, if you are unable to travel anywhere
>without sighted guide, you cannot call yourself an independent
>traveller. This seems right and uncontroversial. But I think
>others, and I'm not referring to the statement above, have made
>statements, which I'm too lazy right now to find and cite directly,
>that suggest it is better, in general, not to go sighted guide even
>when it is available. There are times when it's appropriate no
>doubt, but as a rule, independence requires foregoing sighted guide
>even when you are walking with a sighted person. Perhaps there are
>more nuanced positions, and I'd be interested in hearing those, but
>this is a sentiment I believe I've picked up on.
>
>The thing that puzzles me is that it seems to be acceptable to
>"depend" on the person with whom you are walking in certain ways
>(for example, it's okay to listen to footsteps, or the persons
>voice, or follow directions like left or right), but it's not
>acceptable to "depend" on the person if it involves putting two
>fingers on the back of someone's elbow. Why is one form of
>dependence acceptable while the other is not?
>
>Now, this could be a difference in the definition of sighted
>guide. When I go sighted guide, I continue to rely on my cane to
>find curbs, stairs, poles, etc. I've always thought it strange to
>put the cane away during sighted guide, not because I care about
>dependence or independence, but because I would feel unsafe. I
>suppose if you put away the cane and relied exclusively on the
>sighted person, this would constitute a difference between sighted
>guide and listening to footsteps, but as I said, this isn't my
>version of sighted guide. For me, a light touch on the elbow is
>just a more convenient way of tracking the person with whom I'm
>talking than is listening to footsteps or voice. I do the same
>thing with my girlfriend who is also blind.
>
>I go sighted guide nearly all of the time when I'm walking and
>talking with another person even if that person is not
>sighted. Obviously, if I'm travelling alone, there is no sighted
>guide, and I'm perfectly comfortable with that. I don't think this
>is a matter of dependence or independence since, whether I depend on
>footsteps/voice/directions or a light touch on the elbow, I'm
>equally dependent. To me, this is a matter of convenience. I could
>go from my apartment to my office, which involves a bus ride, an LRT
>ride, and a walk across campus, without my cane. I've walked it
>enough times that I'm sure I could do it, but it would be far less
>convenient to do it this way. Yet no one would suggest that I'm
>dependent on my cane, or at least no one would suggest that I ought
>to try to be less dependent on my cane. Similarly, when I'm having
>a conversation or receiving assistance from another person, I could
>listen to footsteps/voice/directions, but I find this far less
>convenient than lightly touching an elbow.
>
>I recognize that some people may see this and believe that I could
>not do it on my own, but they would be mistaken. I also know that
>those same people might assume that all blind people are like me and
>would not be able to do it on their own either and that these
>beliefs might affect, probably negatively, their interactions with
>other blind people. Again, however, this would be their mistake,
>their prejudice, and their discrimination. And while I regret that
>situation, I won't let people's ignorance and stupidity dictate my behaviour.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Marc
>On 2011-11-10, at 12:44 PM, Jedi wrote:
>
>>Bridgit,
>>
>>I'm with you entirely on the idea that a person, of any sort,
>>walking alone should indicate that help is not needed. But I think
>>those blindness attitudes tend to erode good sense. And I'm with
>>you that our actions mean a lot; we can't claim that we want to be
>>independent travelers and ask for a sighted guide everywhere we go.
>>I'm sorry to say that this is one of the few situations in which we
>>can't have our cake and eat it, too.
>>
>>Respectfully,
>>Jedi
>>
>>Original message:
>>>I can kind of understand how those with little to no exposure to
>>>blindness may be concerned and curious as to how we do something like
>>>cross a street, but, and this may be my naivety talking, when a person
>>>sees a grown person walking about on their own, does common sense not
>>>dictate that perhaps, while not fully understanding it, that person is
>>>probably okay? Maybe they can ask if we need anything, but it's a little
>>>difficult for me to understand how we can obviously be doing things with
>>>no help, but when a sighted person is around we suddenly need their
>>>help? I guess I'm still acclimating to stuff like this.
>>
>>>In crowded situations, I'll take sighted guide sometimes, more so, so I
>>>don't lose whoever I'm with, but I think it helps when we do as much as
>>>possible independently. I also suffer episodes of extremely low blood
>>>pressure which makes me dizzy, weak and can affect my balance. On days
>>>like these, depending on what I need to do, I may take more assistance
>>>than on good days, but I try to be as independent as possible even on
>>>these days, but this also is just because of my personality as much as
>>>it is related to blindness! Smile. While going to school, classmates
>>>became accustomed to me doing things and getting around without help,
>>>and I led the way when it came to when and if I needed assistance. When
>>>classmates would see me around campus, they eventually stopped asking if
>>>I needed help and would just approach me like they would anyone else.
>>>They let me do the asking, and instead, we were able to cultivate
>>>relationships.
>>
>>>The positive energy and confidence we put off helps as much as our
>>>actions. If we present ourselves in as confident of a manner as possible
>>>in any given situation, people will pick up on this and respect us as
>>>people. The more we work on our confidence, the more people will take
>>>note, and more importantly, the better off we feel about our
>>>independence and capabilities.
>>
>>>Sincerely,
>>>Bridgit Kuenning-Pollpeter
>>>Read my blog at:
>>>http://blogs.livewellnebraska.com/author/bpollpeter/
>>
>>>"History is not what happened; history is what was written down."
>>>The Expected One- Kathleen McGowan
>>
>>>Message: 21
>>>Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 23:10:14 -0500
>>>From: Patrick Molloy <ptrck.molloy at gmail.com>
>>>To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
>>>Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Grabbing etc.
>>>Message-ID:
>>
>>><CAN+-G_CeC3zdSdX+TEE1od6936YObAZRvSXG9KXQg2eKU2Ba+g at mail.gmail.com>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>>>I find it quite ironic that, in trying to help us, sighted people
>>>often cause more of a problem with regard to street crossing. Again,
>>>they really do mean well, but their method of help still leaves a lot
>>>to be desired (if desired at all.)
>>>Patrick
>>
>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>nabs-l mailing list
>>>nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>for nabs-l:
>>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/loneblindjedi%40samobile.net
>>
>>--
>>Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network. Visit
>>www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>nabs-l mailing list
>>nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/mworkman.lists%40gmail.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>nabs-l mailing list
>nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>nabs-l mailing list
>nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/carlymih%40earthlink.net
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list