[nagdu] Another development In The Service Dog Discrimination Case

Chantel Cuddemi jawsgirl87 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 9 02:45:26 UTC 2011


Glad you're making progress. 

Email: jawsgirl87 at gmail.com
 
facebook: jawsgirl87 at gmail.com
 
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jawsgirl87
 
skype: leogirl48
 
msn: jawsgirl87 at gmail.com
 
aim: scholarmistress
-----Original Message-----
From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
Of Criminal Justice Major Extraordinaire
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:13 PM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Subject: [nagdu] Another development In The Service Dog Discrimination Case

Hi, all,
Figured I'd update everyone on what's taking further place with the service 
dog discrimination case here at Sunset Park Apartments.
I did get a letter from VOA (Volunteers of America's) attorney, stating that

yes, I'd have to be granted an accomodation to have a new service dog to 
take the place of Odie when he was my guide.
As for my husband Dale, he's working on trying to get necessary 
documentation to provide and proove that Odie is his medical alert service 
dog.
Once I get the next dog, I will be able to focus on the new partnership and 
Odie moves further up the steps of his new career to be with his daddy.
Dale is already having a representative from Freedom Service Dogs write a 
statement on his behalf and will be going down to the FEDEX office to have a

picture taken of him and Odie along with getting everything laminated.
He still is waiting to get a letter from our primary care position.
Regardless, I'm still going to work work with the Colorado Cross Disability 
Coalision mainly to make HUD rethink on putting the service dog exception 
back under policies.
I did post about the new pet rules document a while back in previous 
messages and another problem with the document that I see and it doesn't 
make any sense here is this.
It doesn't have all the call or section numbers and someone easily took 
parts of Hud's documentation on the internet and just pieced it all together

and yes, it is falsified.
If it was a real document, HUD'S logo, call and section number would have 
been in there.
In the new so-called pet policy, dogs over 30 pounds are not permitted as a 
pet unless a medical reasoning accomodation is given.
Factor: We've had residents here in the apartment complex
who have had large dogs in the past and no one said a thing about it and 
now, there's a big uproar on all of that.
What matters to me is that I've accomplished another part in this case and 
I'll be taking the letter down to the Colorado Cross Disability Coalision 
so they can make a copy of it too.
Happily, I'm moving another inch upward in myy accomplishment.
*Smiles*
Bibi and Odie
the happy spirited bounty labra wolf 


_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/jawsgirl87%40gmail.com





More information about the NAGDU mailing list