[NAGDU] Bothering Other Patrons

[David]

Can't remember where I read it.  My thinking is that is in the regs, or 
part of a DoJ advisory. I think the language is 'relieve'.  The words 
for it are my own, because they are more descriptive  'Bothering' is not 
a term of art.

*David and Claire Rose in Clearwater, FL*
*david at bakerinet.com*
On 10/11/2017 3:53 PM, Dan Weiner via NAGDU wrote:
> David, where are you getting that definition of bothering?--smile I 
> can understand and even agree with it but is it written somewhere. 
> What about a manager claiming a dog licked some food when everyone 
> else there said the dog didn't--lol. That happened to me once actually 
> 10 years ago, I wasn't removed though as I first of all wasn't 
> convinced it happened and two offered to buy whatever was damaged but 
> they said "oh no if a dog licks it we'd throw it out too late" so I 
> figured that frankly the whole thing was suspect at best and third 
> other customers said it didn't happen though I suppose they could have 
> just been nice people trying to defend me and my hapless hound--smile
>
>
>
> On 10/11/2017 2:33 PM, David via NAGDU wrote:
>> Business owner may have dogs removed for urinating, defecating, 
>> barking, biting, growling, attacking, climbing on tables, eating food 
>> off tables, sitting in grocery carts, or sitting on chairs. 
>> Prohibitions do not include bothering people who have allergies, or 
>> have a fear of dogs - those are their issues to deal with.
>>
>> *David and Claire Rose in Clearwater, FL*
>> *david at bakerinet.com 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com