[NFB-DB] some thoughts of mine regarding the tech crunch article that was posted to the list.

[Ineko Gary]

I totally agree. I do not want no vibrating cane. And a 3-D of sign language. That is not going to work. They have to think of the deaf blind community. Because there’s a lot of us who need to tactile sign language. And there are some of us who is deaf, blind who still won’t be able to see the 3-D printer. We as desk line and deaf community. We need real life time sign language. Meaning sign language in real time from an actual person. That’s an interpreter for the deaf and the deaf blind. They are taking a step back and not step forward. So I totally agree. This is not going to be good at all waste of money

Lots of love always 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 17, 2022, at 3:39 PM, maurice mines via NFB-DB <nfb-db at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> 
> Good afternoon everyone, while the article from TechCrunch discusses what the company things are benefits of using 3D printing to display fingerspelling. I respectfully object. The company should spend more of their time, money and effort etc. and to advocacy working on getting deaf blind people jobs, and acceptance. In other words this device is something that the concept appears to be apparently laudable. But the reality is it will set us back, not move us forward. Reason personally when I do need to read sign I’d rather read it from an actual person. Certainly not a 3D printer.
> 
> Not from a 3D printer. If I’m going to read any sign, I prefer it being done by a real person. I certainly don’t think that a 3D printer is going to make that process go better. In fact I think it would create another barrier to inclusion not only in the workplace, but in society in general.
> 
> This article reminds me of a device that I once tested a number of years ago. The vibrating cane. Granted this was at a convention of the national Federation of the blind. For to the blind. Unfortunately the chain didn’t work out I ran into a wall. Of course it started vibrating after I ran into the wall. Not before. What is the moral of this story, it simply this if the company really wants to help think about the way we do things now do not invent a new way of communication hoping to sell your device. Which is the only reason why they’re doing this. It’s all about the sales, not about helping us.
> 
>  
> 
> Of course what I’m discussing above is certainly my opinion. But I hope that everyone on the list would at least think about what I’m saying. And think about the reasons why I am saying it. New technology must be not only good but functional, and socially acceptable. Of course it might help if the company consults with us instead of inventing something for us without consulting us.
> 
>  
> 
> please note, that this was all dictated originally into a Microsoft Word document and copied into this email. If there are errors in the above text and you can't understand what I've written above, please reach out to me and asked me what did I really mean? Thank you very much for reading this.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Respectfully Maurice Mines.
> 
> Board member National Federation of the Blind deaf blind division.
> 
> First VP National Federation of the Blind of California deaf blind division.
> 
> Text number 661-868-9647.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NFB-DB mailing list
> NFB-DB at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-db_nfbnet.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfb-db_nfbnet.org/attachments/20221117/6280c6f4/attachment.html>