[nfb-talk] Enough already!
Ray Foret Jr
rforetjr at att.net
Thu Dec 9 22:45:54 UTC 2010
But Joe, reasonable discussion is not what I'm talking about here. I don't care whether someone disagrees with me or not about matters of NFB philosophy, if, as I say, that difference of opinion is well argued. But, that's not what Joseph and I are talking about. I and others have been openly attacked on here for defending NFB or our own positions regarding certain matters. I'm naming names because I really do not think it's necessary.
Sincerely,
The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
Now A Very Proud and very happy Mac user!!!
Skype Name:
barefootedray
On Dec 9, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Joe Orozco wrote:
> We need a thread to specifically remind ourselves of how to behave? The
> only person I think is truly entitled to feel peeved is David Andrews for
> having to muddle his way through the posts. I'm not sure what this specific
> thread is hoping to achieve. I, for one, don't know who this individual is
> people keep referring to, maybe because I only recently resubscribed, but it
> seems the people aligning themselves with the NFB are the ones whose
> comments have been the most blatantly personal. I've not seen anything that
> remotely sounds violent. People should defend their views when their views
> are questioned. That's the point of having a philosophy, and if it's
> somehow too exhausting to continuously defend one's position, the great
> thing about computer interaction is that you really don't have to answer.
> My independence is not shaken in any way by someone's opposing views. The
> only thing that has been shaken is my rationale in resubscribing!
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe
>
> "Hard work spotlights the character of people: some turn up their sleeves,
> some turn up their noses, and some don't turn up at all."--Sam Ewing
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
More information about the nFB-Talk
mailing list