[nfbcs] project tracking software

Jude DaShiell jdashiel at shellworld.net
Sat May 11 17:41:24 UTC 2013


Every one of you on this list with a direct interest in accessibility in 
either the federal workplace or state workplace could do well to 
subscribe yourselves to fedaccessibility-subscribe at yahoogroups.com if 
you want to do it, just send a blank message to that address and you'll 
start that process.  Inaccessibility of office equipment and software is 
often maintained by management in several Federal agencies by blind 
employees having their jobs threatened.  When you have this many 
problems that those problems spread onto at least two e-mail lists yet 
Section 508 Co-ordinators report zero complaints in agencies with blind 
employees in them, something is rotten in Denmark!  I don't know of any 
direct reports, but I've read at least one other member on the 
fedaccessibility e-mail list write in general terms about these kind of 
incidents.  Very probably lucrative for managers to suppress complaints 
since it's reasonable to expect corporations that will not do proper 
accessibility to be compensating those managers to keep the 
accessibility lid on.  The corporations probably reason a few good 
regular payments to certain federal managers in both the acquisition 
chain at first for getting the software licenses purchased first then 
paying off management chains that reach down to blind employees is less 
expensive than doing accessibility properly.  I don't know that any of 
this is correct and if I ever run into specific cases those will be made 
known but based on logic of bribes and pay offs this appears to be a 
very feasible structure for how when and why corporate accessibility 
violators would conduct their business.

On Sat, 11 May 2013, Tracy Carcione wrote:

> I know this is a ridiculous thing to say, but there is a law requiring the
> government to only purchase accessible software, right?  Yet they're using
> JIRA, which Susie says is inaccessible.  Thus, they're breaking the law.  I
> just thought it had to be said.
> Tracy
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stanzel, Susan - FSA, Kansas City, MO"
> <Susan.Stanzel at kcc.usda.gov>
> To: "NFB in Computer Science Mailing List" <nfbcs at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 5:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [nfbcs] project tracking software
> 
> 
> > The project lead sometimes has to use HP Quallity Center because the Testing
> > and Certification Office is part of our team. We submit our software to them
> > for their review before it goes to production. It would be handy if I could
> > use it, but more handy if I could use JIRA.
> >
> > Susie
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Steve Jacobson
> > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 2:24 PM
> > To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [nfbcs] project tracking software
> >
> > Susie,
> >
> > That is interesting that the government is using HP Quality Center.  I had
> > trouble using it but it turned out I didn't have to so I did not pursue it.
> > However, I thought it was more for developing and executing test cases,
> > although maybe that is just one use.
> > Whether it helps or not, if I have to use it, knowing it is used by the
> > government could give me more of a lever to get them to fix those things
> > that don't appear to be accessible.  Unfortunately, I think some of the
> > problem I have seen with HPQC may have to do with screen readers not keeping
> > up as well as they might with modern web approaches.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Steve Jacobson
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 10 May 2013 13:59:16 +0000, Stanzel, Susan - FSA, Kansas City, MO
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Good moring Everyone,
> >
> > >There are two different project and bug tracking programs used at USDA.
> > >They are JIRA which appears not to be accessible and HP
> > Quallity Center which I am not forced to use. Do any of you successfully use
> > project tracking software? I wish all I had to do in my job was code (grin).
> >
> > >Susie Stanzel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA
> > >solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized
> > interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it
> > contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal
> > penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please
> > notify the sender and delete the email immediately.
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >nfbcs mailing list
> > >nfbcs at nfbnet.org
> > >http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
> > >To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> > >nfbcs:
> > >http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/steve.jacobson%40vis
> > >i.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfbcs mailing list
> > nfbcs at nfbnet.org
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/susan.stanzel%40kcc.usda.gov
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfbcs mailing list
> > nfbcs at nfbnet.org
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/carcione%40access.net
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfbcs mailing list
> nfbcs at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/jdashiel%40shellworld.net
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
jude <jdashiel at shellworld.net>
About to block another web browser version?  Ask yourself what Tim
Berners-lee would do.





More information about the NFBCS mailing list