[Nyagdu] hotel room policy

[Tracy Carcione]

I can't say how much I hate this.  And, since it's come from on high,
there seems no real chance to change it.

It bugs me in two ways.  It's easy for me to find people who think that
because I have a dog, I will be a problem of some kind.  I would hope to
find a different attitude in the NFB, but I do not.  In fact, I find the
dog users division saying, Yes, we are a problem because we have dogs.  At
least some of us are.
It's very dishartening.

Second, the whole argument seems so close to the ownership deal to me. 
Some people are irresponsible, so we must treat all people as though they
are irresponsible.  After all, we're only concerned with what's best for
the dogs (and for the organization).  Some GDB graduates used to tell me
to sit down and shut up about that, too.

I give up.
Once again I am asking myself how much time and energy I can give to an
organization that does not respect me. But that's my problem, and no one
else's.
Tracy

> I'm sure by now most of you have read Mario Gwizdala's message concerning
> NFB policies are binding on all levesl from National to local.  I asked
> for clarification of this and since the policy is binding since it is a
> National policy, our affiliate and division are bound by the same policy.
> So, we will need to abide by that policy in our division.
>
> Marion gave me the example of Nyagdu having some event like a seminar and
> it would be a weekend thing where people would be sleeping at the facility
> or hotel or whatever, the national policy would be followed during that
> seminar as well.
>
> Margo and Arrow
> _______________________________________________
> Nyagdu mailing list
> Nyagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nyagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Nyagdu:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nyagdu_nfbnet.org/carcione%40access.net
>