[stylist] Rule for publication

[Jacqueline Williams]

Bridget,
I have mentioned before my worry about putting a poem I intend to submit on
this site. Here is the rule from NSFPS. Tell me how you interpret this. I
interpreted it to mean that even if I want  it critiqued, it is still
putting it up electronically.
I would appreciate comments from all about this problem.

CONTEST RULES
(Any violation will disqualify entry.)
1. Any poem submitted must:
be the original work of the contestant, unpublished in any form, including
electronically and placed on exhibition, not under consideration or accepted
for publication. (Award will be recalled if a winning poem is found to be in
violation of rules before publication in the NFSPS anthology of prize poems

Jackie

-----Original Message-----
From: stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Bridgit Pollpeter
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 1:11 PM
To: stylist at nfbnet.org
Subject: [stylist] A new list for book discussions

Nor does Microsoft Word info and tips, writing and word definitions,
philosophical discussions and debates, debates in general, book
recommendations, how the weather is, how the kids are, who's sick, who's
going to convention... In the few years I've been a part of Stylist, the
majority of posts have revolved around the topics I mention and more. I,
personally, have no problem with this, but from time to time, I see post
ranting about alleged off-topic threads, and people stating what is and
is not appropriate for Stylist, and I have to wonder why this is. If
Stylist was a serious writers online community, we all would be
consistently posting writing pieces we're working on, and as a
community, we would provide constructive criticism and other feedback,
which would be internalized by each author and considered in their
revision. This only happens occasionally, and when someone does post
actual material they're working on, it's rare to have more than 2 or 3
people provide comments. So, how exactly are book discussion or book
reviews not good ideas for Stylist? And to be blunt, most of those
against such a forum on Stylist rarely post their writing. If this
listserve is suppose to be for sharing and critiquing writing, why does
this rarely happen, and if someone is so against anything else posted
here, why do they not share writing of their own? Just my two cents.

Sincerely,
Bridgit Kuenning-Pollpeter
Read my blog at:
http://blogs.livewellnebraska.com/author/bpollpeter/
 
"History is not what happened; history is what was written down."
The Expected One- Kathleen McGowan

Message: 12
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:22:03 -0600
From: "Barbara Hammel" <poetlori8 at msn.com>
To: "Writer's Division Mailing List" <stylist at nfbnet.org>
Subject: Re: [stylist] A new list just for book discussions
Message-ID: <SNT139-ds1402ECBBC9D4AA0713D2F3EBB50 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original

Justin has a point.  That's why I suggested doing it on the writer's
chat 
list.  Talking about books we've read isn't talking about how to write
or 
how to get published or where to find sources for research. Talking
about books we've read is just that.  Reading aids us in being 
better writers but it's not about our writing.
Just my two dollars worth--you know, inflation and all that rot. Barbara


_______________________________________________
Writers Division web site:
http://www.nfb-writers-division.net <http://www.nfb-writers-division.org/>

stylist mailing list
stylist at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
stylist:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/jackieleepoet%40cox.net