[stylist] The ponder to take to another level

Sat Feb 9 00:08:43 UTC 2013

What I am not understanding here, in this discussion, is why are the parents 
of blind children not getting the help they need for their  children? Don't 
they have access to Braille so they can be learning at a very early age 
while they are still at home - before they even enter school?
Why wouldn't the parents seek help and get their children a jump start so 
they can succeed at school?
Is it not available?  Just wondering why they would wait so long before 
getting the help started.

Lynda

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Donna Hill" <penatwork at epix.net>
To: "'Writer's Division Mailing List'" <stylist at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [stylist] The ponder to take to another level

> Bridgit,
> The other thing is that when a sighted kid has a learning deficit, they 
> look
> all over the place to see what the problem is. Is the child suffering from 
> a
> learning disability? Are there circumstances at home that are holding the
> child back? Is the child dealing with a physical or psychological 
> condition
> that hasn't been diagnosed?
>
> When a blind child falls behind, it's because the child is blind. They 
> don't
> look any further than that. If a sighted person can't find their keys,
> they're not paying attention, or they just forgot, no big deal. If I can't
> find my keys, it's because I can't see them. We can't have one deficit or
> problem that can't be explained away by the fact that we're blind. It 
> burns
> me up. It would be one thing if it were just me; after all, that was 50
> years ago. But, it persists today in a state that is little altered 
> despite
> laws, technology and the extraordinary achievements of some blind
> individuals.
> Donna
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stylist [mailto:stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Bridgit
> Pollpeter
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:41 PM
> To: stylist at nfbnet.org
> Subject: [stylist] The ponder to take to another level
>
> I think this is a travesty that kids aren't learning exactly what sighted
> kids are learning. Clumped together, we all learn at different paces with
> different methods, and we all have an individual comprehension level, but 
> at
> most sighted kids (and there are exceptions to this) but in general, 
> sighted
> kids are learning together at the same time, receiving the same 
> information
> with the same material. Blind kids are often not afforded the opportunity 
> to
> access said material at the same time or in the same way. Kids who need
> Braille but don't receive instruction or proper instruction, are expected 
> to
> learn either verbally or via computer, or perhaps both, but they don't 
> have
> the opportunity to pick up information in the same way as their sighted
> peers. Kids who have some level of vision are expected to use this vision,
> and for many it's difficult and tedious, leading them to develop a 
> learning
> delay and worse, giving up. And it's the education system insisting upon
> this disgrace. Regardless what people think, this states that blind kids
> aren't worth the extra effort, and that they don't qualify for the same
> opportunities in life as nondisabled kids. I wrote a paper on this at
> university, but it's such a complicated issue that begins to run off in
> various directions once you research, but it's a problem that needs
> immediate addressing. And of course, education in general needs major 
> reform
> and growth.
>
> Going back to a comment of Robert's, I heard once of a student who only 
> read
> audio material. He was not aware of punctuation and grammar, and he 
> thought
> the phrase, "Once upon a time," was a single word. This just shouldn't be
> happening.
>
> Sincerely,
> Bridgit Kuenning-Pollpeter, editor, Slate & Style Read my blog at:
> http://blogs.livewellnebraska.com/author/bpollpeter/
>
> "If we discover a desire within us that nothing in this world can satisfy,
> we should begin to wonder if perhaps we were created for another world."
> C. S. Lewis
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:03:09 -0600
> From: "Robert Leslie Newman" <newmanrl at cox.net>
> To: "'Writer's Division Mailing List'" <stylist at nfbnet.org>
> Subject: [stylist] Quote to ponder - taken to another level
> Message-ID: <03ed01ce0605$070eb2d0$152c1870$@cox.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We were discussing how the impact of what is read is influenced by the
> reader, themselves (by what they personally bring to the reading-table).
>
> And here is an interesting thought or outcome that is happening to too 
> many
> blind people! First as a baseline thought - the sighted student/reader who
> uses print to read literature, educational stuff and the like - they are
> reading the words themselves, visually scanning, actively processing ---
> while during this process, the student is being exposed to important
> "reading related/literacy" features/elements such
> as: format, punctuation, spelling, and features like tables, graphs,
> pictures, etc. Also, along the same line of literacy, of actively reading
> for oneself --- The blind reader who has the skill of Braille can get the
> same basic exposure to content, plus all the important literacy features 
> as
> - format, punctuation, spelling and the other stuff. However, in today's
> world, at least in this country, Braille is not being taught as a 
> first-line
> method of reading for the non-print reader! And yeah, you all have heard
> this gripe, this warning before.
> There again my point today is a bit different: My thought, question is
> --- hey --- picture this- if you could not read print, did not know 
> Braille
> and could only hear new information, be it a textbook, or poem or piece of
> prose --- you were not getting exposed to formatting, punctuation, or
> spelling of anything you heard; And so I ask does this then essentially 
> take
> the blind person back to the preprint era, back to learning via the oral
> tradition? Yeah --- what are these teachers thinking? (Another bazaar
> thought - what do you think these teachers who are doing this to the blind
> would do --- if they were to find that in school their very own sighted
> children would have print taken away and their child was restricted to 
> only
> listening to what was being taught??)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Writers Division web site
> http://www.writers-division.net/
> stylist mailing list
> stylist at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> stylist:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/penatwork%40epix.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Writers Division web site
> http://www.writers-division.net/
> stylist mailing list
> stylist at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> stylist:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/llambert%40zoominternet.net
> 