[Trainer-talk] accessible bookkeeping/accounting software? cheaper?

[Chris R. Johnson]

  Thank you, Dave,

I'm listening to the audio reviews and plan to try the demo.
And, yes, this is the right address: http://www.accomplishglobal.com/
My only concern is the price, $550, which might be difficult for some 
small business owners. But I didn't ask that.

Thank you.

Chris

On 9/29/10 8:48 PM, David Andrews wrote:
> There is a New Zealand package called Accomplish Cash Manager, I 
> believe, which is supposed to be successful, I think it is 
> accomplishglobal.com
>
> Dave
>
> At 09:36 PM 9/29/2010, you wrote:
>>  Dear helpful trainers of adaptive technology,
>>
>> What is some good accessible bookkeeping software?  Probably not 
>> Quickbooks.  Peachtree (2008 at least) works okay but not thoroughly 
>> (perhaps there are scripts?).  I didn't get very far with the nice 
>> and free TurboCash.  And the free and advanced Postbooks with 
>> Postgresql is too complex for me to begin as a program alone right now?
>> I know the choices are tremendous, but has anyone found something 
>> that works well for them? even a homemade integration of several 
>> programs (e.g. Excel, database, mailmerge (for invoices)?
>>
>> Chris Johnson,
>> Assistive Tech Specialist
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/1/10 11:38 PM, James Teh wrote:
>>> On 2/05/2010 12:26 PM, tempjayren at gmail.com wrote:
>>>> also, i will hear things like button 4 of 20. and i have no idea what
>>>> button 4 is.
>>> The Windows system tray is rather flakey. Sometimes, the buttons 
>>> just seem to lose their labels. You can sometimes fix this by moving 
>>> the mouse to the button using NVDA+numpadDivide.
>>>
>>>> when i say not all are accessible, what happens here is say 
>>>> there'll be
>>>> 20, using that previous example, only 6 to 8 of them will be available
>>>> for some reason.
>>> The number provided is not necessarily the number of icons. In 
>>> reality, it's the number of objects reported to us by Windows, but I 
>>> suspect that includes the empty spaces that used to (but might no 
>>> longer) be occupied. We should probably consider killing the number 
>>> altogether here, as it is too confusing for users.
>>>
>>> Jamie
>
>                         David Andrews:  dandrews at visi.com
> Follow me on Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/dandrews920
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trainer-talk mailing list
> Trainer-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/trainer-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Trainer-talk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/trainer-talk_nfbnet.org/express_able%40yahoo.com 
>
>